To The Editor:
The OS EDC, which has itself endorsed the acquisition of The Preserve, recently released a letter asking five questions. They deserve a response. In order of importance, they are:
- Cost to the taxpayer. In short, very little and perhaps nothing at all. Read on.
Acquiring The Preserve under the proposed agreement saves Old Saybrook potentially tens of millions of dollars the town would have incurred if development as planned had gone forward—and might still incur if The Preserve is left open to development. Perhaps more important to some residents is that acquiring The Preserve will almost certainly save Old Saybrook money. First, the cost to taxpayers for the bonding required for the town’s share of the purchase price—less than 40%–implies annual property taxes for a median home of $12 to $24 dollars, depending on the form of bonding. So for $1-$2 a month, residents take control of an extraordinarily important 1000 acres, the headwaters of three rivers, a critical source of clean water for the area aquifer, and an environmentally important area. Second, the costs the town now incurs will almost certainly go down. The proposed agreement includes a very substantial permanent endowment (perhaps reaching $1 million) which will provide funds to cover proper management of The Preserve, including trail mapping, trail marking (so folks no longer get lost on the unmarked, tangled trails they now hike), and permit sustainable forestry practices. In addition, because of the partnership with the State, state conservation officers will share the responsibility for policing the area, relieving Old Saybrook police of some of that responsibility. And because the area will now be managed properly, residents in Old Saybrook and adjacent towns no longer face the very real threat of damage to the aquifer and degradation of their water supply—thus again saving potentially thousands of dollars for every household affected. On balance, it is almost certain that town costs will fall by more than the cost of the bonding.
Wen considering costs, beyond the offsetting savings we can immediately recognize, preserving The Preserve will create value for the town and the region. Real estate professionals will tell you that the two things potential home buys ask about are the quality of the schools and access to public open space, whether parks or forests. Multiple studies confirm that towns that acquire and manage significant open space clearly benefit along a host of vectors. Given how well this acquisition is planned, with the creation of an endowment to provide continuous funding and the partnership with State, preserving The Preserve will deliver real value to the town and the region.
- Why the State is interested in assuming more than 40% of the purchase price: Connecticut has, since the early 1970s, taken a very strong bipartisan interest in preserving open space and improving environmental quality. Perhaps some remember when the lower Connecticut River was heavily polluted and the target of quite embarrassing coverage by the New York Times. The river is now remarkably clean and a major asset to the region. Moreover, the Federal government provides significant financial incentives and support for these kinds of initiatives, which are so important to sustaining and strengthening a healthy natural environment.
- Has anyone approached Lehman Brothers directly? I don’t know; I suspect not. Frankly, Old Saybrook could acquire very little by trying to “go it alone” with its $3 million. Buying two fifths of The Preserve appears absurd on its face—it avoids none of the potential costs the town would incur if the balance of the land were then developed (new school, new police and fire stations, roads and bridges to maintain—a frightening potential cost)—and captures almost none of the benefits. It would not achieve environmental protection nor guarantee against degradation of the aquifer with the threat to the three rivers that draw on The Preserve; it would not create well-managed public access; it would not provide an endowment to provide funding to manage and maintain the property. It is an approach that would have secured virtually no benefit but left the town open to potentially massive expenses in the future.
- Is hunting allowed? Just as with the existing 500-acre Gleason property that Old Saybrook owns, state law does permit “regulated hunting” on these kinds of open spaces. But Old Saybrook has never permitted hunting on the Gleason property, and it is unlikely that the town would permit it on The Preserve. Moreover, given that this a state statutory requirement, if the issue ever did emerge—and there is no reason to anticipate that it will, as it has never come up with the Gleason property—then modifying the state law would be quite straight forward. Besides, leaving The Preserve in private hands would make hunting in all forms much much more likely—just as leaving it in private hands runs the very significant risk of future developments that will impose significant continuing costs on the town.
- What are the pros and cons? The comments above point to multiple pros. Whether your interest is in environmental protection, assuring access to high quality water (the aquifer), avoiding degradation to rivers flowing form The Preserve, having easy access to a wide array of passive recreational activities, making the region more attractive to potential residents, or simply preserving the forest canopy which mitigates global warming (the NE is an important carbon sink, especially during some months), acuiring The Preserve for a comparatively small sum makes eminent good sense. And then add the shared responsibility (and costs) with the state and the first-ever dedication endowment in support of a part or open space, and it is extremely hard to find an argument against this acquisition.
The cons? I have been listening intently for nearly a year. I haven’t heard one argument against this initiative that withstood careful scrutiny and thought. I believe that the answers to the OS EDC questions strongly confirms that view.
Acquiring The Preserve and thus preserving it for all time is simply a winner on every count. Old Saybrook will be quite wise to join with the Trust for the Public Lands, the State of Connecticut, and hundreds of individuals who have pledged more than $1 million of their own money to make this happen. Let’s take control of our future: vote “Yes” on July 8.
Fred V. Carstensen
Professor of Finance and Economics
Director, Connecticut Center for Economic Analysis
University of Connecticut
Resident: Old Saybrook