May 18, 2012

Public Access, “Not in My Backyard,” say Residents of Foxboro Point at Public Hearing

The scenic landscape in all its splendor the morning after the Planning Commission meeting

The sentiment was loud clear at the Essex Planning Commission’s public hearing on May 10 at Essex Town Hall. The future neighbors of the Foxboro Point development do not want “public access” at the site.

Specifically, (1) local residents do not want to give the general public the right to walk down a pathway from the road to the water, and (2) they do not want to allow the general public to walk along the water’s edge of the site.

As evidence of the opposition of neighboring property owners to “public access,” every time a speaker attacked it, there was vigorous applause.  By contrast when Essex resident Bill Reichenbach got up to urge the Planning Commission to require “public access” at the site, both to the water and along the water, when he sat down there was nothing but a stony  silence.

Developer offers a little area of “public access”  

In something of a surprise, Judge of Probate Terry Lomme,  acting in his “after hours” capacity as counsel to the Foxboro Point developer, offered a new, very modest “public access” proposal to the Commission.

The essence of the proposal was that the developer would allow a small “pocket park” of “public access” at the site. Also, immediately below this “nice little park,” as Judge Lomme called it, there would be a visual, “public access” easement down to the waters of North Cove. This meant that a visitor to the “pocket park” would have a small viewing area to look down at the waters of North Cove, but not to walk there.

The proposed "pocket park" is shown at the top of a blue vertical strip. The horizontal green strip indicates the shoreline easement.

Planning Commission Chairman Dr. Thomas Danyliw appeared miffed that the developer had come forward with this new “pocket park” plan. He said that he thought that the developer had agreed at the last meeting to formulate a “public access” plan  that would incorporate a pedestrian path to the water from the road, as well as a pedestrian strip along the waterfront.

“I thought there was a general agreement to focus on this,” Chairman Danyliw said.  Instead, Judge Lomme was now ignoring what the Chairman thought the developer had agreed to, and was proposing an entirely new plan of “pocket park” access.

“This is a new proposal, and this is not what we agreed to at the last meeting,” Chairman Danyliw said, heatedly. “I was surprised,” he added.

Planning Commission Chairman Dr. Thomas Danyliw and Vice Chairman Linda Herman

In an attempt to deflect the Chairman’s ire, Judge Lomme said that he had, “listened to the neighbors of the development,” and that the new proposal was closer to what they wanted than what had been discussed at the last meeting. He added, “You can’t make everybody happy.”

“Public access” is not legally valid attorney charges

The next development at the public hearing was an even greater surprise. A resident of the Foxboro area had hired a private lawyer, named John Bennet, to represent him and his wife at the Planning Commission proceedings.

In his appearance before the Commission, Attorney Bennet began by not only attacking the Commission for recognizing “public access,” but also the entire legal authority of “public access” under Connecticut law. He said that if the Commission in any way recognizes a right of “public access” in its deliberations, “We will oppose you.”

“You are wrong to recognize “public access,” Attorney Bennet said, and he added, “It is unfair to foist public access [upon his clients].”

Bennet then cited case after case, which he said demonstrated that “public access” could not be recognized, because it had no legal legitimacy under Connecticut law. Essex subdivision regulations purporting to grant “public access,” he said were wrong.

In response Chairman Danyliw said to Bennet, “You are challenging the very core of our authority.” To which Attorney Bennet responded, “You cannot hold as legitimate a public access easement.”

Interrupting the litany of cases that Bennet was citing to show that no state law in Connecticut legitimizes “public access,” Chairman Danyliw asked Bennet to put his arguments in writing. In a conversation with Attorney Bennet after the hearing, he said that he intended to write a letter to the Commission summarizing his arguments against the validity of “public access.”

Attorney John Bennet seated after his stand up attack on the legal legitimacy of "public access"

A lawsuit could delay the Foxboro project for years

 It remained an open question as to whether Bennet’s arguments before the Planning Commission, questioning the very legitimacy of “public access,” would ultimately lead to a lawsuit against the Planning Commission. This could be the result, if the Commission were to recognize “public access” in its decision approving the Foxboro Point development.

If a lawsuit were brought, the development of Foxboro Point could be set back for years, as the lawsuit made its way through the courts.

After this contretemps over “public access” was finished, the Commission continued its public hearing in a normal fashion, with speaker after speaker stating that they were against applying “public access,” as part of the Foxboro Point development.

The hedging threat to the new development

Another topic mentioned at the public hearing was to note that the developer had promised to establish a perpetual visual easement that would restrict overly large hedges and other visual obstructions at the development in perpetuity.

Just what tall hedges would look like at the site is demonstrated by the dense, nine foot hedges that are presently in place along Foxboro Road on the other side of the road from the development site. Such tall hedges and other tall obstructions could block the view to North Cove, and of course to the windmill, if they were permitted.

Nine foot, visually impenetrable hedges across the street from the site. A foretaste of things to come?

Essex Land Trust favors “public access” at site     

Essex Land Trust President Bob Nussbaum and Land Trust Acquisition Committee Chairman Paul Greenberg made a presentation that essentially endorsed Bill Reichenbach’s view that the Commission should approve “public access” via a new public pathway from the river to the road, coupled with a pathway along the shore.

However, in an interview after the meeting, Greenberg said that he was reaching out to the developer’s counsel, Judge Terrence Lomme, to see if the Land Trust could reach a compromise with the developer that would be satisfactory to both entities.

At the public hearing the Land Trust representatives noted, “We are neighbors of the Foxboro Point property in that the Land Trust’s Great Meadows area is located just across from North Cove.” Mentioned as well was that if a compromise on “public access” failed at the site, the Essex Land Trust was empowered to accept monies from a developer to acquire an equivalent open space property in other areas of Essex.

As the drumbeat of speakers’ rejecting “public access” continued, one member of the audience said, “Our property is our first priority, except possibly our children.”  She continued, “If you let the public in, it is going to be a pig sty out there.”

Another speaker said simply, “Public access, I just don’t get it.”

There followed a brief discussion about installing docks along North Cove by property owners, and it was agreed that any party who wished to install a dock would have to get Planning Commission approval.

Near the end of the public meeting Judge Lomme made the point that in his opinion, “The developer has offered benefits to the community above and beyond those that are required.”

Chairman polls Commissioners for their views

After the public portion of the hearing ended, Commission Danyliw called on Commission members to express informally their views on the developer’s application. The result was that support for “public access” at the site was underwhelming.

With the applicant’s latest “pocket park” proposal before them, the next Planning Commission public hearing on the Foxboro development is June 14.

Share

Deep River Land Trust Unveils New Logo for 15 Deep River Land Trust Properties

Over 30 Deep River residents turned out for sign unveiling ceremony

The day itself could not have been more perfect for a gathering of the   Deep River Land Trust. The sun was sparkling. The air was clear, and the beauty of the natural surroundings was beyond description.

It was also a perfect day for the unveiling of the Land Trust’s new logo for its 15 protected properties in Deep River. Over thirty Deep River residents turned out for the unveiling ceremony, which was held on Sunday at the Evelyn and Hawthorne Smyth Sanctuary in Deep River.

The Sanctuary itself is located on Essex Street in Deep River. To find the Sanctuary, as you head out of town towards the Town of Essex, you   first cross some railroad tracks. Continuing, the Sanctuary is on your left up an incline. There is also a parking area on your right just before the Sanctuary. The new sign at the Sanctuary marks the beginning of a trail within the Sanctuary.

After some generalities about the beauty of the place, Deep River Land Trust President Suzanne Haig made some serious points about the importance of the work of the Deep River Land Trust. She said that the properties of the Deep River Land Trust were not about just “preserving the land.” “It is also about preserving the habitat for the wild species that live on the land,” she said; “It is a fish and wild life refuge.”

Deep River Land Trust President Susanne Haig holds forth

Haig also said, “We are not only preserving the land for ourselves, but also for future generations.” In addition, she noted that the Deep River Land Trust was now meeting with other local land trusts on a monthly basis to address common issues.

“This is your land,” she concluded. “It is just as nice as Pettipaug and easier to get to.”

Then, it came time for the unveiling of the first of the new signs with the new logo. The logo itself was designed by local Deep River graphic artist Caryn Paradis.

Deep River First Selectman Dick Smith unveils sign while Haig ducks

Deep River First Selectman Dick Smith did the honors of pulling the cover away from the first sign with Deep River Land Trust President Haig looking on.   After the unveiling, Smith made this observation, “Preserving the land in Deep River is the most important component in preserving the quality of life in our town,” he said.

Colorful sign and logo by Deep River graphic artist Caryn Paradis

Share

Planning Commission to Address Public Access at Foxboro Site

The Croft estate, whose owners oppose "public access," as part of the new development

The Essex Planning Commission could make a big decision at its upcoming meeting on May 10 at 7:30 p.m. at Essex town hall. That is whether the Commission should require the developer of the 11 acre Foxboro Point property to add “public access” areas on the site.

“Public access” occurs when the general public is given a right of access to private property, but it does not affect the ownership of the property.

Public access at the Foxboro Point development could take the form of a pedestrian walkway running down the south side of the property from Riverview Street to North Cove. It could also mean creating a public access strip of land running across the North Cove frontage of the property.

At the April 17 Planning Commission meeting Commission Chairman Dr. Thomas Danyliw, and several other Commissioners, appeared to be sympathetic to some kind of public access with the developer’s proposal.

There is no question that under the Planning Commission’s Subdivision regulations that the Commission has the power to require public access areas in a developer’s property. It is also clear under the regulations that the Commission is not required to adopt public access, if it chooses not to.

The arguments against granting public access

At the last meeting of the Planning Commission, it was clear that many neighboring residents of the Foxboro Point development were very much opposed to public access, even though they seemed generally in favor of the overall project.

Strong opposition to public access was made clear by Greg Ellis, whose wife and her sister own the Croft estate, which is being sold to the developer for the project.  Ellis said that “public access conflicts with our intent to preserve the coastline environment, as it has been for the past 70 years that our family has lived there.”

He argued that, “Public access goes beyond the Essex residents who walk in the area.” “Public access is open to all, and it cannot be assumed that public access will be passive,” he said.

Ellis also said, “Even now, without public access, the intrusion of trespassers results in littering, disturbance of wildlife habitat and breach of privacy.Also he noted that Essex already has, “12 locations in the Village proper of Essex with public access to the water, beautiful views and boat launch areas.”

Some public access sites presently in Essex

Those “public access” areas referred to by Ellis include the extensive grounds of the Osage Trail, which happens to be located just across the road from the proposed development.

Osage Trails, across Foxboro Road from the development site, has "public access"

Another existing public access area in town is just off Teal Lane. This attractive property has benches to sit on, a boat launch area, boat storage racks and even a toilet.

Yet another town public access area is located just off Novelty Lane. It features a pebbled path down to Middle Cove, as well as a bench and a ladder to the water.

"Public access" site off Novelty Lane has a pebbled path and bench at Middle Cove

Those in favor of public access at the new development

For all the hostility to public access by neighboring land owners, a number of influential groups in Essex favor it as a component of the Foxboro Point development. They include the Essex Conservation Commission and the Essex Land Trust.

In its letter to the Planning Commission on April 30, the Essex Land Trust said that it had a “strong preference” for a plan “that sets aside 2.2 acres of open space on the south side of the Foxboro property extending from the street to the water with a path for public access.” “Most new subdivisions in Essex have open spaces set aside,” the letter said, “and Foxboro should be no exception.”

A less preferred option for the Essex Land Trust, it wrote, would be “a fee in lieu of open space … of up to ten percent of the value of the undeveloped land.” The monies from this fee would be spent for an “open space acquisition someplace else in Essex,” it said.

Local Essex resident favoring “public access”

Bill Reichenbach, an Essex resident who has opposed the Foxboro development since it was first proposed, said in an interview that if the development was to go forward, it should at least have a public access component.

Reichenbach said that public access steps could be taken “limiting access along the water in ways that will address concerns … regarding safeguarding the privacy and security of abutting property owners and protecting the flora and fauna running along the water.”

“Using the Newport Cliff Walk as a paradigm,” Reichenbach suggested that “such access could be limited to a five-foot wide designated pathway running through the conservation easement area [along North Cove].”

“As is the case along the Newport walk, abutting property owners could place fencing and view screening hedges or other plantings on their properties above the conservation easement,” he said. He added that, “due to the upward slope of the properties, views from their houses would not thereby be obstructed.”

Also, he proposed limiting access to the public access areas with restrictions, “such as no picnicking and limiting access to daytime only, also would help address concerns about littering and security.”

In a subsequent letter to the Planning Commission, Reichenbach said, “The Commission should not settle for half a loaf, particularly when the Commission’s regulations expressly authorize it to make public access available, not just to the water, but along the water as well.”

Planning Commission can require public access

Should the Commission ultimately grant some kind of public access, it is clear that under the Essex’s Planning Commission’s Subdivision Regulations, it is empowered to do so.

The Commission’s Subdivision Regulations provide, “In such cases where the proposed subdivision abuts coastal waters, the Commission may require such open space in the form of public access to and along the waterfront.”

Although those opposed to public access in a case such as this, might argue that North Cove can hardly be classified as “coastal waters,” since the waters of North Cove fall under the provisions of the state’s Coastal Management Act, it would appear that North Cove can he legally classified as “coastal waters.” Therefore, making such an argument would, most likely, fail.

Visual “public access” promised to historic windmill

The Foxboro Point developer has agreed to preserve visual public access from Foxboro Road to the iconic windmill below.  As for the other public access proposals, although they have been discussed, there has, as yet, been no commitment to their creation by the developer.

Also, in a step to bolster the attractiveness of its proposal, generally, the developer’s attorney, Probate Judge Terrence Lomme, released an estimate as to the amount of new real property taxes that the Town of Essex would receive, if the Foxboro Point development was approved.

During the construction period the increased real property tax revenues to the town could run as high as $145,000 a year. After the homes in the development have been built, the increase in town real property taxes could increase by as much as $255,000 a year, according to Judge Lomme, who stressed that these figures were estimates.

Share

Congressman Courtney Brings News of $8 Million Contract for Essex Firm

Bell Power President Martin Bell, Congressman Joe Courtney and Essex First Selectman Norman Needleman

Congressman Joe Courtney came to Essex on April 30 to announce that an Essex based machine company has been awarded an $8 million contract to rebuild diesel engines for the U.S. Army.

Recipients of this welcome work order is Bell Powers Systems, which is located in an industrial park on Plains Road in Essex.  On hand to receive the Congressman was Martin A. Bell, President of Bell Powers Systems, and Essex First Selectman Norman Needleman.

Bell Power worker at reconfigured Yellow Godwin water pump

Company President Bell said that the new contract was an extension of an earlier contract, and was most welcome.  He estimated that work on the Army contract could take as much as four years to complete, and it will mean the continued employment of five workers. The company presently has 63 employees at its Essex headquarters, and does $60 million a year in business.

Bell Power worker at refigured Red Hole fire pump

The company also has an inventory of 1,200 engines, which vary in size from four to 600 horsepower and operates out of a 56,000 square foot building in the Essex industrial area.

Authorized distributor for John Deere and Yanmar

Bell Power is the authorized distributor of two of the world’s largest engine manufactures, John Deere and Yanmar. The essence of Bell Power’s business is that it takes engines that it gets from John Deere and Yanmar and reconfigures and provides value added components so that they fit the specifications that are required by the end user.

Bell Power's distributors' logos on display at company headquarters

Once Bell Power has reconfigured the engines to meet customer specifications, they are sold through the company’s service dealer network, who in turn sells the engines packages to the end users.

Reconfigured engine in high heat testing chamber

As for its marketing area, Bell Powers is the authorized distributor for John Deere diesel engines for all of New England, as well as New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia and a part of West Virginia.  It is also the authorized Yanmar Industrial Engine distributor for all of New England, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland and most of New York.

After the brief announcement ceremony, Bell Systems President Martin Bell made the point that it was small businesses, such as his, that are most important to growing the nation’s economy.

Share

The Essex Boat Show Is Underway, Power and Sail are on Display

The main dock of the show, off Novelty Lane in Essex

“Calling all hands.” Come visit the Essex Boat Show, which is being held on Novelty Lane in Essex from Friday, April 27, to Sunday, April 29, open 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

The first day of the show, April 27, was a wash out. The wind was blowing at 40 miles an hour, and attendance was light. However, the show’s second day, Saturday, after a cold start turned out to be bright and sunny.

Essex Boat Show is promoted on Main Street

Generally speaking, the larger vessels, both power and sail, were on display. Among the power boats, large Nordic Tugs were very much in evidence, as were the Hatteras and Grand Banks brands.  Sailboats too were in 40 to 50 feet long category. In fact, it might have been more appropriate to call the show, the “Essex Big Boat Show.”

A Nordic Tug 28' at the show

Four Essex yacht brokers are sponsoring the Essex Boat Show. They are: 1) Boatworks Yacht Sales, 2) Eastland Yachts, 3) Prestige Yachts and 4) Hank Aldrich Yacht Sales.

As with all boat shows there was more looking around and asking questions, then there was actually purchasing boats. However, in at least one instance, Leslie Guarrier of Boat Works Yacht Sales appeared to have found an interested buyer. He said to her loud and clear, “I might want to buy a boat.”

Yacht Broker Leslie Guarrier closing the deal

Also, hovering nearby was Debbie Soudan of Sterling Associates of Old Saybrook. She was ready to provide financing to buy a boat. “You can borrow money for under 5% these days,” she said.

Sailboat seller Jim Eastland of Eastland Yachts

Share

Runaway Vehicle Smashes into Three Parked Cars in Riggio Garden Center’s Parking Lot in Essex

Closed and damaged front doors of Riggio's Garden Center

It happened the morning of April 26, and by the time it was all over three parked cars in front of Riggio’s Garden Center in Essex had been smashed into, with one of them seriously damaged. Also, the front door of Riggio’s had been crushed off its hinges, and the store’s main entrance had to be taped shut with yellow tape.

According to an eyewitness, who was in the store at the time, the scenario of the incident went like this. First, a car, which was parked in front of Riggio’s main entrance, backed up forcefully, and hit another car parked behind it, “very hard.”

Next, the out of control vehicle pulled sharply forward, and smashed into a second parked car, a Saab, which was parked in front of it. The Saab in turn was pushed into the front doors of the garden center, forcing the doors off their hinges.

Then, finally, the out of control vehicle pulled forward and hit a third car, pushing this car over the store’s new statuary display in front of the garden center.

Soon after the incident Police and Fire officials arrived, and in the words of the eyewitness, who declined to give her name, “It was just like the movies,” with lights flashing and emergency vehicles on hand.

Reportedly, the driver of the runaway vehicle was a 74 year old woman, who was escorted away from the scene by authorities.  Fortunately, no one was hurt in the incident, according to the eyewitness.

Riggio employees were particularly concerned that the vehicle smashing incident occurred just before its open house this Saturday, April 28, when the store in gratitude entertains its customers with a picnic.

Banner for April 28 "cook out" for Riggio's loyal customers

Although the official police report of the Essex Police of the incident was requested, it was not made available.

Share

Essex Historical Society to Hold Contest for “Best Historical Building in Essex.” Voting Taking Place in May at Local Post Offices

First Preservation award winner, the Ivoryton Library

The Essex Historical Society is sponsoring a town wide referendum to determine what local residents consider to be the best preserved, historical building in town.  Voting for a favorite choice will be take place during the month of May, during which time ballot boxes will be made available at the town’s three post offices in Essex, Centerbrook and Ivoryton for the voting.

The historical building that receives the highest number of votes will receive the Essex Historical Society’s second annual Preservation Award, as well as an accompanying certificate.

Last year’s winning historical building, which received the first annual Preservation Award from the Essex Historical Society was the historic building of the Ivoryton Library, located at 106 Main Street in Ivoryton. The certificate for last year’s award hangs above the fireplace inside the library building.

Eligibility requirements for the Preservation Award   

Either residential or commercial buildings are eligible to receive the Preservation Award.  However, to qualify the building must have been built in 1936, or earlier, and if the structure has been renovated in any manner during its existence, the renovations must have preserved the original style and form of the building, as well be in the style of the time period during which the building was built.

This year’s Preservation Award winner will also be honored at the Essex Historical Society’s Annual Spring Strawberry Social, which will be held on the grounds of the Pratt House on June 25th. The Pratt house is the headquarters of the Essex Historical Society, and it is located at 19  West Avenue in downtown Essex.

Share

Essex First Selectman Proclaims “Michele Connelly Day” for Stellar Town Volunteer

Essex First Selectman Norman Needleman issued a Proclamation declaring April 21, “Michele Connelly Day,” in tribute for the work of Essex resident Michelle Connelly, “who has exhibited a sense of commitment and dedication working with Essex youth.”

The Proclamation continued, “We say ‘thank you’ to Michele who has unselfishly given her time, love and mentorship as a volunteer and surrogate guardian, enabling our young people to grow, mature, become confident, successful individuals.”

The full text of the Proclamation is as follows:


Share

Neighbors embrace proposed Foxboro Point Development; New York City Developer has won Their “Hearts and Minds”

Developer's attorney Terrance Lomme

By the time the April 17 public hearing of the Essex Planning Commission was over, current residents of Foxboro Point were practically oozing their praise for New York City developer, Frank Sciame.  His proposal of seven homes on eleven acres would after all keep property values on Foxboro Point very, very high, and this is fine with the residents of this upscale section of Essex.

Just to rub it in, Sciame noted in passing at the public hearing that Essex town zoning regulations would permit as many as 24 new homes on his eleven acres of Foxboro Point property. Without saying it, Sciame let hang in the air, which neighboring properties would they prefer: (1) 24 new homes jammed on little lots; or (2) seven spacious new parcels, each possessing over an acre of land?

New York City developer Frank Sciame at the Planning Commission

Or putting it another way, would neighbors want new homes which would lower property values, or a few big homes, which would sustain higher property values. Obviously, the second choice was preferred, and for this reason homeowners on Foxboro Point became allies of the developer.

New layout presented and rejected by all

Sciame’s private attorney Terrance Lomme, who has maintained a private practice of law, while serving as a sitting Judge of Probate over nine shoreline communities, began the developer’s presentation by offering a new layout for the 11 acre, Foxboro Point property. This new scheme was meant to meet some of the objections that were expressed at the March 8 public hearing of the Essex Planning Commission.

However, Sciame, himself, immediately, got up and attacked the new plans after they were presented by Attorney Lomme. “We don’t like it,” Sciame said of his own handiwork. “We do not want to do it,” he continued, and he added that the new layout “would block all views to the windmill.”

The windmill at Foxboro Point

Commission reverts to old plans

It turned out that the members of Commission did not like the new plans either, (they even had a parking lot in the middle of it), and so the new plans were quickly shelved, and the Commission members went back to working with the plans originally proposed by the developer in March.

With this settled, developer Sciame began a discussion of the architectural guidelines that he would insist upon before conveying the parcels to their new owners.  Furthermore, these guidelines would not only be embedded in the initial buyers contract to buy the property, they would be carried forward to apply to any future conveyances of the property he said.

Planning Commission Chairman, Dr. Thomas Danyliw, expressed doubt that these architectural guidelines could be carried forward in future sales of the various individual properties. However, Sciame was confident that they could be made in effect “to run with the land.”

One architectural guideline that was mentioned by Sciame was that a new owner would not be allowed to build a new home in a contemporary style. Another architected guideline would prohibit further subdividing the original purchased property. In fact, Sciame was adamant that the original density of the seven properties on the eleven acres of land would be preserved. “We shall make it,” he said, “so this [breaking up of parcels] can’t be possible.”

Sciame was also confident that by the method of architectural guidelines, “We can have a visual corridor to the windmill,” and he added, “We want the restrictions in architectural guidelines to be recorded and reflected in the deed.

A new public access corridor to the water?

After these discussions, there ensued a long discussion about the mapping of a public access corridor running from the road to the waters of North Cove. This topic was first introduced by Essex resident Bill Reichenbach, and later echoed in a letter from the Conservation Commission.

The essence of both Reichenbach’s remarks, and the letter of the Essex Land Trust, is that the developer is required to provide some viable scheme of pedestrian, public access from the road at Foxboro Point to the waters of North Cove.

A pedestrian pathway from the street to water was discussed extensively, especially one that would run down the south side of the development from road to water. In fact, it appeared that the developer was going to draft such a path to present at the next meeting of the Planning Commission, which will be held on May 10.

However, in informal discussions after the meeting with the developer’s consultants, it did not appear that they felt that there was a compelling need to address this public access pathway.

Sciame’s meetings with Foxboro Point residents

New York City developer Frank Sciame

Without question one of the major factors at the April hearing of the Planning Commission was the strong support for the project by the residents of Foxboro Point. In fact, prior to the meeting Sciame, made a number of personal visits with the residents of Foxboro Point.

He even perhaps encouraged one Foxboro Point residents to attack, preemptively, requiring any kind of public access from the road to North Cove. “We do not want public access,” this neighbor said. “There are already twelve locations in the Town of Essex where there is public access to the water.”

Focusing specifically on visual access from the road to the windmill will be the subject of another site walk of the Essex Planning Commission on Friday, April 20 beginning at 6:00 p.m. on the road above the development property. Members of the commission and those interested  in the topic are invited to attend.

Share

Courtney Supports Effort to Dredge Westbrook Harbor with a $500,000 Federal “Earmark”

Westbrook First Selectman Noel Bishop (on left) with Cong. Joe Courtney and State Senator Eileen Daily celebrating new harbor dredging dollars

“This earmark had wings,” called out an excited Rives Potts at the ceremony to celebrate Congressman Courtney’s $500,000 federal earmark to dredge Westbrook Harbor. The recent ceremony was held at Pilots Point Marina in Westbrook. Potts, the Vice President and General Manager of the marina, will directly benefit from the new dredging of Westbrook harbor.

The Pilots Point Marina has a public, gas dock right in the harbor, and the deeper the harbor is dredged, the greater the number of deep draft vessels can be served by the marina’s gas dock.

Pilots Point Manager Rives Potts gives thumbs up to new federal earmark

In addition to helping a local marina, Town of Westbrook First Selectman Noel Bishop, who chaired the Courtney gathering, saw many other economic development benefits to the Town of Westbrook, when it has a deeper harbor.  The money spent by boat-arriving visitors will help the town “in many, many ways,” Bishop said. He mentioned specifically restaurants, food markets and other local businesses.

An interesting sidelight to the earmark that Courtney ultimately directed to Westbrook is that originally these earmark monies had been directed to new projects in neighboring Old Saybrook. However, with the agreement of Old Saybrook First Selectman Carl Fortuna, who attend the Courtney event, the monies were “reprogrammed,” so that they could be spent on dredging Westbrook’s Harbor instead.

With Senator Daily in center, and sporting a broken ankle, are supporters of the $500,000 federal earmark

Many Old Saybrook boat owners moor their vessels in Westbrook Harbor, so the argument can easily be made that dredging Westbrook Harbor means helping Old Saybrook boaters as well as those of Westbrook.

As for the timetable of dredging Westbrook Harbor, dredging will not actually begin until October of this year. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will have overall supervision of the project, and the Corps’ dredger boat, “Currituck,” will be used.  The performance of the actual work will be done by a local Westbrook contractor, Patchogue River Dredging.

According to a number of persons at the ceremony, Westbrook Harbor was last dredged in the early nineties.

$1.1 in state grants for dredging from State Senator Daley 

Although the recent celebration of the Courtney- sponsored $500,000 federal earmark was certainly appropriate, Westbrook State Senator Eileen Daily has already arranged a total of $1,100,000 in Connecticut state funds for dredging Westbrook Harbor.

These state funds were appropriated in two separate implements by the Senator, one for $350,000, and the second for $750,000. Considering the magnitude of these amounts, the Senator must be considered the leader in getting the monies necessary for dredging Westbrook Harbor.

In the Connecticut state legislature Daily holds the powerful position of Chair of the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee. From this position, especially in the finance area, she can wield considerable power in the choice of funding state projects, as she certain has appeared to have done in the case of dredging Westbrook Harbor.

On hand to celebrate are Westbrook's Noel Bishops, State Rep. Jim Crawford, Cong. Courtney and Pilots Point's Rives Potts

As for the Courtney earmark Daily said, “Congressman Courtney’s federal grant will serve a very useful purpose in the Westbrook Harbor dredging project.” However, when the history of dredging of Westbrook Harbor is written, most likely Daily’s name will be mentioned as the project’s leading fund raiser.

Getting a federal earmark entails a lot of effort

In his remarks at the ceremony Congressman Courtney noted that the official name of the federal earmark program is the “Restore America’s Prominence Act,” and its grants are called “RAPA grants.” Courtney confirmed that getting these grants is an extremely competitive process among the nation’s Members of Congress.

Ed O’Donnell, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer’s representative at the event said, “Without the dogged help of Congressman Courtney, this money would have gone elsewhere.” A number of others at the Courtney event characterized the Congressman as being. “a dogged sponsor, absolutely unrelenting” in his efforts to obtain the earmark grant.

Share

Close to 3/4 of Essex Town Budget is Spent on Schools; and 1/4 on Everything Else

Valley Regional high school has 630 students

Education expenses for the public school children of Essex received a major portion of the Essex town budget in the last fiscal year. In fact, close to 3/4 of the town’s total budget, 73.1 % to be exact were dedicated to education expenses.

In contrast the town’s general operations budget, covering everything from park maintenance to policing, was just over 1/4 (26.9%) of the town’s budget.

Education expenses by category

In the present 2011/2012 Essex fiscal budget, education expenses on a percentage basis break down as follows: Essex elementary school  (24.45%).  Region 4 schools of John Winthrop middle school and Valley Regional high school (27.9%); Education supervision expense (12.6%) and Education debt service (8.1%).

Essex elementary school has 572 students

 

John Winthrop middle school has 340 students

To those who say that the Town of Essex is spending far too much of its budget on education, in defense James D. Francis, Chairman of the Essex Board of Finance, points to what he refers to as “the contract.” This means in his words, “When you sent your children to school, the town paid much more than your property taxes covered to educate them.  You balance out that gift by continuing to support the schools, even after your children are grown.”

Picking up a child at Essex elementary school

This could mean, for example, if the true cost of educating your child in public school was $13,000 a year, and your current property tax was $5,000 a year, you would be on the plus side of “the contract.” When your child is finished attending public schools of course, this would no longer be the case.

Complicating this “payback” concept of course is that town education costs, “keep moving up,” as Francis puts it.  He cited the growth of “special education” costs as one such factor.

Also, although Francis’ feels it will add little extra expense, in the next school year full-day kindergartens will replace the present half-day classes.   Furthermore, there is even discussion at the state level that public elementary schools in the future will be required to offer nursery school classes.

Two public proceedings on the Essex town budget

Two public proceedings are scheduled to focus on the next fiscal year’s Essex town budget.  Both will be held at Essex Town Hall.

The first will be a public hearing on April 19 at 8:00 p.m., sponsored by the Essex Board of Finance, to discuss the new 2012-2013 town budget. Both the Board of Finance and the Board of Education will participate.

The second will be an open town meeting on May 14, at 7:30p.m., to decide whether to adopt next year’s fiscal budget at the meeting, or to submit the budget to a town-wide referendum.

Which of these approval methods is decided upon, will be announced in advance of the May 14 meeting, according to Francis.

Region 4 budget referendum

In addition to the two Essex meetings on its new town budget, there will be a referendum on the Region 4 Board of Education’s new budget. It will be held on May 8 from noon to 8:00 p.m.at Essex Town Hall.

Another factor in the steady increase of the Town of Essex education expenditures is that the town’s percentage share in the Region 4 budget continues to climb. This is because Essex’s school age population is increasing at a rate greater than those of the other towns in the Region 4 school district, which are Deep River and Chester.

Yet another factor in the darkening cloud of ever increasing education expenses in Essex, according to Finance Chairman Francis, is that in Essex there is very little open space remaining, within the town’s boundaries that could be developed into new taxable land.

Bravo for new “Citizens’ Guide” on Essex town budget

To further budgetary understanding, the Town of Essex recently published a new “Citizen’s Guide to the Essex Town Budget,” which is available in the literature rack just inside Town Hall, when coming in from the parking lot. The guide is also accessible on line at the Essex Town web site, www.essexct.gov.

The guide’s explanation of important budget terms and procedures is outstanding!

Although the “Citizens’’ Guide” is overall a thoughtful and comprehensive guide to the intricacies of the town’s budget, and where the money goes, there is one very minor flaw. There is sometimes an over use of abbreviations.

For the reader of the guide, BOS means Board of Selectman; BOE means Board of Education; BOF means Board of Finance, and even Chairman Francis was baffled by this one, ADM means, which means “Average Daily Membership.”

Role of Essex Board of Education

The Essex Board of Education, chaired by Essex businessman Lon Seidman, also plays a major role in determining the funding of Essex schools. Seidman said recently that the new proposed Board of Education budget “reflects a 1.78% increase over last year’s budget.”

He also said, “The [Essex] Board of Education started work on our budget in December … [and] … We’ve worked collaboratively over the last several months to put together a fair budget that meets the educational needs of our young people.”

Seidman also invited Essex residents to review the Board’s budget document, which can be found at bit.ly/eesbudget2012. As noted, the Essex Board of Education will give a report at the April 19 Town Hall meeting.

Share

Chester Airport, the Shoreline’s Gateway to the Sky

The Chester Airport is thriving on a hilltop

Chester Airport in a sense is already up in the sky. The airport is located at the top of a 415 foot prominence, towering over the surrounding landscape below.  The airport’s street address is 59 Winthrop Road in Chester, and it is located a few miles west of Exit 6, off Route 9.

Chester Airport of course provides routine aviation services for the takeoffs and landings of general aviation aircraft. The airport has a single 2700 foot long runway and has personnel on duty to greet incoming aircraft during normal daylight business hours.

Chester-based pilot Bruno Kitka takes off in his Piper Seneca bound for Schenectady

Also, like many general aviation airports, Chester Airport offers air taxi service for traveling business persons and vacationers. Frequent destinations are to New York and Boston, and to vacation spots such as Nantucket, Bar Harbor, and even the Caribbean.

These chartered, general aviation flights are provided by Chester Charter, Inc., which can be reached at 860-526-4321, or at www.chester-charter.com.  Still handling these routine airport services is only one of the services that Chester Airport provides to the area’s aviation community.

The “Discovery flights” at Chester Airport

The airport is also the jumping off place for aerial sightseeing tours of the beautiful Connecticut River valley, courtesy of Chester Charter. To get you started in the air, the company offers a ½ hour “Discovery flight.” The cost of this introductory flight is about what you would pay for a dinner for two at a local Chester restaurant.

Chester Charter also offers more extensive air passenger rides for one to four passengers. Cessna aircraft are used for these flights, and the cost comes to about $150 per passenger on a four passenger flight.  The taking of aerial photography is a favorite on these flights.

Then, if you want to bring out the Red Baron in you,* there is the unique option of flying in the open cockpit of a Boeing  Stearman, a vintage, 1941 biplane.  This exhilarating flying experience is priced accordingly, and we shall leave it at that.  The “de rigueur” outfit for a flight in the Stearman are goggles and a leather hat that covers the ears.

Taking up water-filled balloons to drop on the ground below, from the open cockpit of the Stearman, is not allowed, as tempting as that may be.

Learn to fly at Chester Charter flight school

Beyond the thrills of airplane rides and aerial sightseeing, Chester Airport also offers serious flight training courses at the Chester Charter Flight School.  Chester Charter partner, Jean Dow, is at the airport to help would-be pilots started in learning to fly.

Chester Charter partner Jean Dow says, "Learn to fly here"

Flight training at the flight school includes a ground school with eleven hours of instruction. Chester Carter uses Jappesen products for its ground school, and miscellaneous materials, such as charts and directories are provided to flight school students as well.

Chester Charter flight school is also a Cessna flight training center, and it uses Cessna 152’s and Cessna 172’s aircraft.

The amount of instructional flying time in the air, required to become an FAA certified pilot, varies immensely. Although the minimum air time required by the FAA is as low as 40 hours (20 in flight hours with an instructor and 20 in flight hours solo), this is the bare minimum required. Also, it is rarely appropriate for student flyers.

In fact, the national average for the completion of FAA flight training is 72.8 hours in the air, well above the 40 hour FAA minimum.

As for the cost of tuition at the flight school it is more affordable than some might think.  By the time you are certified as a pilot, it is certainly much, much less than a single year of college tuition costs these days. And you have learned to fly!

Maintaining your aircraft at Chester Airport

In addition to teaching students to fly at the Chester Airport, there is an extensive aircraft maintenance facility at the airport called the Chester Charter Airplane Factory. The Factory is essentially an aircraft maintenance and service facility, which is accessible both to aircraft permanently based at the Chester Airport, as well as transient aircraft.

The Factory also hosts Stellar Aironics, which services and repairs aircraft radar and ground positioning systems.

Renting hangar space for aircraft

The Chester Airport also rents hangar space on a long term basis, as well as short term space for transient aircraft. There is interior space in the long line of hangars down the airport’s single runway, as well as “tie down” spaces in the open air on the tarmac.  The average in-hangar rental for a two-seated aircraft is $250 a month, according to James A. Olson, the Airport Manager.

Indoor storage of aircraft at Chester Airport

Olson also holds the title of Corporate Vice President of Aviation of Whelen Engineering Company, Inc. He says that, “Since the airport’s rejuvenation, after the Whelen family bought the airport 20 years ago, the place has been thriving.” “Presently, 100 plus airplanes are based here,” he notes, adding that “there is a long waiting list for an open spot in one of the airport’s hangars.”

As for the size of aircraft that can land and take off at Chester Airport, the airport’s helicopter pad is big enough to accommodate large helicopters. Also, it can handle the take offs and landings of large, multi-engine aircraft as well. However, Chester Airport, obviously, cannot accommodate modern day, jumbo jets.

The typical pilots who fly the planes at Chester Airport

Airport Manager Olson has some unique insights into the pilots who fly out of Chester Airport. “Generally, they fly smaller planes,” he says, “predominately on weekends.” Also, favored destinations of the weekend flyers are smaller airports that have a good restaurant nearby.

Chester-based pilot Bruno Kitka with his Piper Seneca

“They know where the good restaurants are,” Olson says in admiration.   Once they have landed and eaten at their restaurants of choice, the pilots fly back home to Chester. Computing the cost of this one day flight plan can be as much as $200, or more, mainly because of the high cost of aviation fuel to make the trip. The lunch itself is a minor expense.

Just come out and watch the planes

Airport Manager Olson without reservation says, “Visitors are always welcome at the airport.” “It is good to see people satisfying their aviation curiosity,” he says with a smile. As for his own flying experience Olson says, “I started flying, when I was 13 years old.”

Airport Manager Jim Olson, started flying at age 13

Chester Airport is indeed a wonderful place to visit on a clear, clear sunny day, even if you have absolutely no intention of flying anywhere. Just go out and lean on the sparkling white fence, next to the runway, and watch the aircraft take off and land.

People frequently speak of “the wonder of flight.” Evidence of that wonder is in our midst at Chester Airport.

______________________________________________________

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­*The “Red Baron” was the German ace, Manfred von Richthofen, who had 80 confirmed kills in World War 1. The Red Baron himself was killed near the end of the war.

Share

State Representative Phil Miller Working to Keep Toxins Away from Kids and Food

State Representative Phil Miller (D-Chester, Deep River, Essex, Haddam), Vice Chair of the state legislature’s Environment Committee

State Representative Phil Miller (D-Chester, Deep River, Essex, Haddam), Vice Chair of the state legislature’s Environment Committee, has announced that the Committee recently passed two bills that would limit the use of known toxins in the State of Connecticut.

The Environmental Committee approved a bill, (HB 5218 ), that would ban any product containing “Tris,” which is a common flame retardant that is being marketed in Connecticut for the use by children, three years or younger, according to Miller. Tris was once widely used in children’s pajamas, until in 1977 when it was outlawed from this use because of adverse health effects.

“Tris has been found in almost 80% of baby and children’s products, including changing table pads, mattresses, baby carriers, and high chairs,” Miller said. “We have a responsibility to protect the state’s kids and limit their exposure to harmful products,” he added.

The Environmental Committee has also recently approved legislation, (HB 5116), that would require the labeling of food packaging that contains bisphenol-A (BPA). Studies have linked BPA to reproductive problems, learning disabilities, and cancer, Miller noted. Connecticut already bans the use of BPA in reusable food and beverage containers, and containers for infant formula and baby food.

“Although many manufacturers are behaving responsibly and removing BPA from their products, Connecticut consumers deserve to know if BPA could be seeping into their food,” Miller said.

He added, “Children are particularly vulnerable to BPA, since exposure is greater pound for pound than with adults, and systems to metabolize BPA have not been fully developed.”

Both bills are now headed to the full House and Senate for their consideration.

Share

Essex to Fly Flag, Favoring “Organ Donations” Throughout the Month of April

The Town of Essex will unfurl an “organ donation” flag, which will fly just below the U.S. flag on the town flag pole, during the month of April, according to First Selectman Norman Needleman. The “organ donation” flag will be part of a state and national effort to raise public awareness as to the importance of organ and tissue donations.

The new flag will say, “Donate Life,” and, “Donation Saves Lives.” The Town of Essex will be one of 50 Connecticut towns, hospitals and organizations that that will participate in the national “Flags Across America” campaign to encourage organ donations.

“I personally support organ donations, because they help so many people,” said Essex’s Needleman, as he posed with the flag that will go up the Town Hall flag pole in April. “Becoming an organ donor is one of the most generous decisions a person can make to help others,” he said.

“Connecticut residents can register to save lives by an organ donation two ways: when they renew their driver’s license, or by visiting the secure online website, www.DonateLifeNewEngland.org ,” he continued.

Needleman said that he personally is a registered organ donor, a status that is indicated on his driver’s license.

 1,200 in Connecticut need organ transplants

Recent estimates are that 110,000 people in America, and 1,200 in Connecticut alone, are waiting for a transplant from an organ donor, and that the need for organ donations has never been greater. By signing on to “Flags Across America” campaign, the Town of Essex has became a partner with Donate Life New England.

Donate Life New England is a joint project of three federally designated organ procurement organizations that serve New England. The three organizations are (1) New England Organ Bank, (2) LifeChoice Donor Services, and (3) the Center for Donation and Transplant and the Connecticut Eye Bank.

The New England Organ Bank is the oldest independent organ procurement organization in the country, and it serves over 160 acute care hospitals for organ and tissue donation and 12 transplant centers.

LifeChoice Donor Services serves 23 acute care hospitals for organ and tissue donations and two organ transplant hospitals, one of which is Hartford Hospital.

The Center for Donation and Transplant coordinates the retrieval of donated organs and tissues for the Connecticut Eye Bank and other health services organizations in New York and Vermont.

 

 

 

Share

Putting in the Docks, a Spring Ritual at the Pettipaug Yacht Club in Essex

Former Commodore Sandy Sandstrom directs the lowering of dock sections by means of the electric hoist

You know spring is coming, when the volunteers at the Pettipaug Yacht Club start putting the club’s docks in the waters of the Connecticut River.  Because of the violent ice flows in winter, and the high water run offs of early spring, every fall the club members have to hoist the docks out of the water, and place them safety on land.

Then in spring, the docks go in again.

Pettipaug’s docks are put together by joining 15 separate dock sections, each of which measure 16 feet by six feet, and which weigh 1,200 pounds. The sections, once in place, form an up-river North Dock, constructed with five joined sections, a Middle Dock, designed especially for rowers, of four joined sections, and a South Dock of six joined sections.

Read Commodore David Courcy brought his daughter Aurora, age 8, to assist and supervise

Last Saturday’s work party was only able to put in place the North and the Middle Docks. The South Dock, whose dock sections are hauled to the water with the aid of a large and temperamental back hoe, were not installed last Saturday. The reason was that that the back hoe was once again “on the fritz.”

Past club Commodore Walter (aka “Sandy”) Sandstrom said he would try to fix the ailing machine in time for another work party next Saturday. As for the general condition of the back hoe, another Past Commodore, Paul Risseeuw, says, “Its put together with bailing wire.”

Installing the North and Middle Docks, thankfully, does not entail using the “back hoe.” Rather the sections for these two docks are piled up for the winter within the radius of the club’s electric hoist.

This hoist can be positioned to pick up individual dock sections from the ground, one at a time, and then swing them over, and then down into the water.  The hoist has the capacity of lifting as much as one ton or 2,000 pounds of dead weight, and it always works.

The anatomy of a dock section

As for the make-up of the 15 dock sections, each of them has a wooden deck on top; and underneath there are six fitted “plastic buckets,” each filled with foam, which gives the dock section its buoyancy. In addition to the deck on top and the foam infused plastic buckets below, the floating dock sections have heavy metal fixtures at each their ends to hold the dock sections together.

A motor boat is launched to haul the joined sections of the North Dock into place

By tradition the club’s Rear Commodore is in overall charge of putting the docks into the water in the spring, and hauling them out of the water in the fall.  In charge of this spring’s “launching of the docks” was the club’s present Rear Commodore, Dave Courcy.

Also, generally supervising things at the dock launchings was Club Commodore Chris Manero.

With motor boat pointing backwards the North Dock is floated upstream to its location

Once fully in place, the Pettipaug’s Yacht Club docks in the spring  are heavily used by the sailing clubs of a number of local schools, including Xavier High School, Valley Regional High School, Daniel Hand High School in Madison, and Trinity College.

The Middle Docks are primarily used for rowers. Also, tied up to the dock on a permanent basis are four powerboats, called “crash boats” by club members. These are used to pluck capsized sailors out of the water, when the occasion arises. Also, the crash boats serve as water taxis, taking club members out their boats during season.

Powerboat Classes and Sailing Academy coming up

In addition to launching, hopefully, the South Dock this coming Saturday, Risseeuw and fellow teacher, Beth Robinson, will be teaching a Powerboat Class for 18 Boy Scouts, ages nine to fourteen, with ten powerboats in the water.

The scout’s Powerboat Class will go from 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., and both instructors this coming Saturday will be donating their time to the Boy Scouts. Upon completion of the one day course, the scouts are eligible to receive a scout Motor Boating Merit Badge.

Also, day long, powerboat instruction classes will continue to be held throughout the sailing season. The cost of tuition for the course is $175 for a very full day of hands on the throttle.

In addition, ahead on the Pettipaug Yacht Club’s season is the exceedingly popular Pettipaug Sailing Academy. Risseeuw is the Director of the Sailing Academy, the first session of which begins on July 1. The mission of the academy is to teach young people how to sail.

The Sailing Academy accepts 150 students in all for its summer programs, and according to Director Risseeuw, “We have more applicants than we know what to do with.”

The Academy splits its students into various categories. Among the ranks in ascending order of sea competence are, “Seaman, First Mate and Boatswain (pronounced “bos’n).” Also, the Academy has two separate sessions of three weeks each during July and August.

It’s a busy time ahead for the Pettipaug Yacht Club, if they can just get those South Docks in.

Immediate Past Commodore Cameron Taylor poses on completed North Dock

 

 

Share

A “Portfolio of Photos” of Essex’ St. Patrick’s Day Parade on St. Patrick’s Day

The pictures really tell the story. Here it is, the hugely successful St. Patrick’s Day Parade that took place down the Main Street in Essex on St. Patrick’s Day, March 17, 2012.

Click on pictures below to see full size image:

Share

Will Foxboro Point Developer Walk Away if Required to Grant “Public Access” to the Site?

The iconic windmill at Foxboro Point, preserved at the choice of developer

“Requiring public access is a game change,” said Frank J. Sciame, Jr., with anger in his voice. As it was, his company, one of the leading construction firms in the nation, had offered to develop Foxboro Point in Essex with the epitome of good taste.

There would be strict, esthetic requirements in place on the private houses that would be built. There would be a 150 foot conservation easement back from the shore for all of the seven building lots, and a generous 27% of the development would be designated as open space.

Furthermore, the Croft mansion on the site would be preserved; and finally, finally, the iconic windmill adjacent to the site would be preserved, even though Sciame made clear to those attending the Essex Planning Commission public hearing on March 8, that he was not required to preserve the windmill.

The historic Croft mansion on Foxboro Point to be preserved in the proposed development

However, tempers soon cooled, and Mr. Sciame’s representatives, Civil Engineer Joseph Wren of Old Saybrook, and “off duty” Judge of Probate Terrance Lomme, who serves as the developer’s private counsel, were already discussing some kind of modest public access to the development property after the meeting.

One thought was to propose building on the property, a sliver of public access land from the road down to the 150 foot conservation easement, perhaps some eight feet wide with a high hedge on both sides. However, comments were not forthcoming that such a compromise would be acceptable to the developer

Sciame does not own the property; he could walk away

One thing to consider is that Sciame does not presently own the property, neither the eleven acres of his proposed development, nor the property under the windmill.  Sciame has only a contingent right to buy these properties, and if he is prevented from developing the property in the way he wishes, he could get out of his contract to buy it, and simply walk away.

If he did so, one can fairly assume that Sciame would shelve his presently expressed plans to become an Essex resident.

Besides deferring immediate approval of the proposal, some of Sciame’s advisors were concerned about the informality of the meeting, where clapping and audible noises of approval of the speakers’ remarks were permitted by Planning Commission Chairman Thomas Danyliw.

Sharp criticism from Essex resident Reichenbach

Some of the harshest criticism of the development plan of Foxboro Point was made by Essex resident Bill Reichenbach. In addition to maintaining that “public access to and along the waterfront” was required under Section 5.8.3 under Town of Essex regulations, Reichenbach termed the development itself as “tragic,” and “a most unfortunate application.”

Reichenbach’s objections were seconded by Essex resident Frank Hall.

Another quarrel with the proposed development was the charge that the proposed “view easement” is not mapped out so that a person can see the windmill from the road at Foxboro Point.

One of the last speakers at the over one hour and a half discussion came from a woman from the back of the room, who said that she was a lifelong resident of Essex. She spoke so forcefully in favor of the development that Chairman Danylwi asked her, if she were in anyway retained by Sciame.

She gave a firm “no,” adding the interesting footnote that when they first built the windmill on Foxboro Point years ago, “everyone was against it.”

Background of developments of Frank Sciame  

Without a doubt Frank S. Sciame heads one of the leading constructions firms in the country, most especially in New York City. Not only has his company built a number of smaller developments, the type of which he showed at the Planning Commission hearing, he has also developed some extremely high profile projects.

Much praised Morgan library restoration, exterior view

They include the much praised renovation of the Morgan Library and Museum in New York City. Closer to home Sciame completely restored the former home of Katherine Hepburn in Old Saybrook.

Interior of Sciame restored Morgan library

Sciame was also designated in 2006 by then New York Governor George Pataki and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg “to lead the effort to ensure a buildable World Trade Center Memorial in New York City,” which was troubled by delays at the time. He is also the Chairman of the South Street Seaport Museum in New York City and Past-Chairman of The New York Landmark Conservancy.

Aerial view of Sciame restored Katherin Hepburn estate in Old Saybrook

Asked for a comment by Frank Sciame, regarding the Planning Commission public hearing on March 8, John Randolph, Executive Vice President, Sciame Development, Inc., said in an e-mail message, “I spoke with Frank [Sciame]. We have no comment at this time.”

The Planning Commission at the end of the March 8 meeting requested that the developer come back to the Planning Commission with an open space version of its development plan. The “no comment” response the day after the meeting could make it an open question, as to whether or not the developer will do so.

Share

Judge of Probate Terrance Lomme, Busy With Probate Cases, and Non-Probate Matters as Well

Judge of Probate Terrance Lomme

Judge of Probate Terrance Lomme has immense responsibilities, as a sitting judge of probate for nine towns in eastern Connecticut.  Not only is he the judicial officer who determines the validity of Wills for probate in these towns, he also has many other judicial tasks that are unrelated to probating Wills.

The responsibilities of Judge Lomme not related to Wills include: 1) appointing guardians for persons with intellectual disabilities, 2) approving sterilization and placement of persons with intellectual disabilities, and 3) appointing conservators for persons found incapable of caring for themselves.

Also, Judge Lomme has the power to: 1) remove unfit parents as guardians of their children, 2) hear claims of paternity of unwed fathers, 3) terminate the parental rights of parents, who cannot fulfill their parental responsibilities, and 4) grant adoptions.

In addition, Judge Lomme is empowered to: 1) grant changes of name, 2) approve or disapprove the marriage of persons under the age of 16, and 3) assist persons in obtaining passports, which he usually refers to U.S. Post Office down the street.

Also, in cases of deceased persons, who died without a Will, Judge Lomme is charged with the responsibility of apportioning the assets of the deceased in accordance with statutory requirements.

The nine towns in Judge Lomme’s judicial district

The nine towns in Judge Lomme’s judicial district are: Chester, Clinton, Deep River, Essex, Haddam, Killingworth, Lyme, Old Saybrook and Westbrook, and his suite of offices are located on the second floor of the Town Hall of Old Saybrook.

To assist him in exercising his judicial responsibilities, Judge Lomme has a staff of nine, lead by his Chief Clerk, Valerie Shickel. To adjudicate the matters under his jurisdiction, Judge Lomme says that he holds on average from 15 to 20 hearings a week. Hearings are held in a room across the hall from his main suite of offices, and they are open to the public. In conducting the hearings Judge Lomme wears a suit and not a judge’s robe.

Judge of Probate offices in Old Saybrook Town Hall

In many cases there are fees involved, when a party appears before Judge Lomme, most especially in probate matters. In some cases these fees can run into thousands of dollars. These fees are paid with the application regardless of whether there is a hearing. Usually the fees in matters involving Wills are covered by taking the money from the estate of the deceased. Also, the monies collected, obviously, go to the state and not to the judge.

The annual salary of Judge Lomme as a Judge of Probate is $110,000  a year.

The qualifications of Judge of Probate Lomme

Judge Lomme brings an extensive background to the position of Judge of Probate. Elected in 2010, Judge Lomme has over thirty years of experience in practicing law. He also holds a Juris Doctor degree from Quinnipiac University, and he is a graduate of Eastern Connecticut College.

When characterizing his present position as a Judge of Probate over nine towns in Connecticut, Judge Lomme says, “I have a pretty full plate.”

Even though judges of the Superior Court, the Appellate Courts and the Supreme Court of the state are prohibited from practicing law for private clients, this is not the case for the state’s Judges of Probate.  

Because of his very full plate as a Judge of Probate, even though he knew that he could continue to practice law, Judge Loome has radically reduced his private law practice. He has resigned as a partner of his law firm and now holds the less demanding position as Of Counsel. Also, he has reduced the number of clients that he has at his firm, from 150 to 10, according to the judge.

Representing a “high profile” client in Essex

Judge Lomme is presently representing a “high profile” private client in the Town of Essex. The client, a New York City developer, is seeking to develop 11 acres of land on Foxboro Point. Foxboro Point is considered one of the most beautiful areas in Essex, and the Judge’s client is seeking to build seven new homes on a parcel, which is located directly on North Cove of the Connecticut River.

Judge Lomme representing Foxboro Point developer at hearing

In his capacity as a private lawyer representing the developer, Judge Lomme to date has appeared at public hearings of both the Essex Inland Waterways and Watercourses Commission and the Essex Planning Commission.

The Inland Waterways Commission held that the developer’s plans were outside its jurisdiction. However, there could be opposition to the Foxboro Point development at the Planning Commission hearing, coming up on March 8. Should this opposition occur, most likely, Judge Lomme as private counsel would seek to refute it.

Judge Lomme will also accompany the developer’s Civil Engineer, Joe Wren, as he conducts a “site walk” for the members of the Planning Commission on March 3, as Wren did previously for the members of the Inland Wetlands Commission.

Judge Lomme characterizes his assignment for the private developer at Foxboro Point as “zoning work.” As such he deems it totally appropriate for a Judge of Probate to assume a private counsel’s role. Also he says that this kind of work “works out well, because I can do it nights and weekends.”

Stating that he has “a heightened sensitivity to conflicts,” Judge Lomme says that he would recuse himself, if a member of the Essex Planning Commission came before his court during the Foxboro Point development’s approval process. He also says he would expect a member of the Planning Commission to do the same, and not vote on the Foxboro Point project, if they had a case before his court.

Some observers feel that it is only a question of time before Judges of Probate will no longer be permitted to practice in law for private clients, in addition to their official judicial duties. However, for the present it is permissible under the law. In fact, Judge Lomme estimates that as many as 80% of the Judges of Probate in the state represent private clients in addition to their judicial duties.

Share

Middlesex Hospital Moves Ahead with Plans to Move Essex’s Shoreline Clinic to Westbrook

New Westbrook location of Clinic will be on road to Tanger Outlet Center

Middlesex Hospital is moving, full speed ahead, to move the present Shoreline Emergency Clinic in Essex to a new location just off I-95 in Westbrook. The move could take place as early as October 2013, according to the hospital’s Senior Vice President, Henry Evert.

Evert said of the present Essex facility, “We are totally out of space.” The new Westbrook location will be on Flat Rock Place, just down from the Tanger Outlets. It will be on the left hand side of the road, when approaching the shopping mall.  Presently, the site is just woods.

According to Evert a “purchase and sales” agreement has already been signed for the new 40,000 square foot site, which is double the size of the present Essex facility. The hospital’ senior vice president also said that Westbrook town authorities view the new development “very favorably,” and that there will be a meeting about the project at a Westbrook Planning and Zoning Commission on February 28.

Evert has also spoken before the Westbrook Chamber of Commerce about the new medical facility coming to Westbrook. He declined to say what the hospital paid for its new property, other than to say it was “a lot of money.”

The Shoreline Medical Center leaving Essex in 2013

Evert said that the new emergency clinic, off I-95 at Exit 65, “would provide better access to medical care for the shoreline communities.” He said that a picture of the new facility is not yet available. “We are still working on it,” he said.

He added that “as the population has grown in surrounding towns over the last 40 years, it made more sense to relocate the facility off I-95 to improve access to healthcare services for a rapidly increasing number of people in the shoreline area.”

Share

North Cove Outfitters Going “Out of Business” After Almost a Quarter Century in Old Saybrook

No secret, North Cove Outfitters going out of business

North Cove Outfitters in Old Saybrook has been a landmark store on Main Street for hunters, fisherman and campers for nearly a quarter century. Now, it is closing its doors with one big final sale.

“I’m very sad, I will miss a lot of my friends,” said Kathy Fowler, who has worked at the store for 23 years. Closing the store she said “will be a big loss for the town, especially Main Street.”

However, in its final “going out of business” sale, the store is not exactly giving things away. In fact, on a recent visit it appeared that most items were a modest 10% off, or at most 30% off.  As one bargain hunter who was looking around noted, “Ten percent is nothing.”

"Ten percent is nothing," said one shopper

Store owner Norman Cavallaro, who owns the store with his partner, Edward Carney, was asked about the prevalence of sale items that were only 10% off. In response he promised that as the “going out business” sale progresses, prices will get lower and lower, “even as low as 50%.”

Sweaters for 30% to 50% off

Cavallaro said that one alternative to the extended “going out of business” sale, which could last as long as six to eight weeks, could have been to close the doors immediately, and sell all of the store’s merchandize “to a jobber.”

“But we did not want to go away in the middle of the night,” he said, “That is not the legacy that we want to leave. We did not want to do that,” Cavallaro said. We wanted “to try to keep employees on the store’s payroll as long as possible.”“It is not about me,” he said.

Lots of people looking for bargains

When asked which were the most popular items being sold at the “going out of business” sale, Cavallaro mentioned clothing and even some canoes. Also, the store has “always been selling a lot of firearms,” he said. The store’s extensive inventory includes, “guns, rifles, shot guns and pistols, and it has always been a strong line,” he noted.

North Cove Outfitters received many awards

Cavallaro also mentioned with pride the many awards that North Cove Outfitters had received over the years. He said the store was judged as the “Best Outdoor Store in the Country” by Backpacker Magazine. Also, it was considered the “Best Retailer of the Year” by Canoe & Kayak Magazine. In addition, the store received a “Recognition” plaque from the Old Saybrook Land Trust.

The store owner then brought up again the store’s employees, some forty of them in all, who will be losing their jobs because of the store’s closing. “I love their professionalism,” he said, noting the number of employees who have worked for many years at North Cove Outfitters, which is still located for awhile longer at 75 Main Street in Old Saybrook.

As for what has been the store’s secret of success over the years, Cavallaro had this to say, “As an owner you yourself don’t have to be smart, you just have to hire smart people.”

Old Saybrook First Selectman Carl Fortuna had this to say about the closing of North Cove Outfitters, “The residents of Old Saybrook are truly sorry to see North Cove Outfitters close its doors. The store has made a wonderfully iconic contribution to our community over more than two decades. Our town is now going to strive very hard to find a replace of equal quality.”

Share

Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission has no Objections to Foxboro Point Development

Windmill at Foxboro Point will remain undeveloped in the new proposal

The Essex Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission at a public hearing on February 14 voted unanimously that a plan by a New York City developer to subdivide eleven acres of waterfront land at Foxboro Point will not adversely impact the town’s inland wetlands, or its watercourses.

The New York City developer, Frank J. Sciame, Jr., did not personally appear before the Commission at the hearing; however, he was represented by Essex private attorney Terrance Lomme and Joe Wren, PE of Indigo Land Design of Old Saybrook. A representative of the developer, John Randolph, monitored the hearing but did not speak.

The subdivision would consist of seven separate lots, including the property of the existing Croft house, and sites for six new houses. Each of the sites in the development plan would have frontage on North Cove.

The Croft house, presently the only house on the proposed new subdivision at Foxboro Point

One unique feature of the development, according to Wren, is a proposed 150-foot wide conservation easement, extending landward from the edge of the river along the entire river frontage of the property. The proposed conservation easement will preserve that area and protect it from any development in perpetuity.

The total acreage of the conservation easement is 2.43 acres, or 22% of the 11.03- acre property.

In his presentation before the Commission, Wren stated that no new roadways would be required, because all seven lots have adequate frontage along Riverview Street or Foxboro Road.

As for the fate of the iconic Windmill on the northern portion of the proposed subdivision, Wren said in an interview after the hearing, “In my opinion it will not be destroyed but will stay a windmill.” However, he pointed out that, although the windmill would be on land owned by the developer, it is a separate lot and is not part of the proposed subdivision.

Seventy five foot visual corridor to North Cove in plan

Another unique feature of the proposed Foxboro Point subdivision would be the creation a 75- foot wide, open visual corridor protected with a view easement from Foxboro Road down to the waters of North Cove.  The windmill is not within this visual corridor, but it could be seen, obliquely, from the road after the homes have been built, Wren said.

Wren noted that the creation of the visual corridor from the Foxboro Road to the waters of North Cove was the idea of the developer, who wished to preserve a visual open space to the waters of North Cove.

Another issue that was discussed at the hearing was the question of whether docks would be allowed to extend out into North Cove.  Wren said that the water is very shallow in front of the properties of the proposed subdivision and that any proposed dock would be subject to full D.E.E.P. permitting requirements.

Commission members were in agreement that if there were any plans to build new docks by property owners in the subdivision, they would have to appear before Wetlands Commission for approval.

The developer’s engineer also said that the new houses on the site would have access to public water, and that each new property owner would have to construct an individual septic system.

Now that the Wetlands Commission has found no objections to the Foxboro Point development, permission to proceed with town approval of the new subdivision will be considered at a public hearing of the Essex Planning Commission on March 8, according to the Essex Zoning Enforcement Officer Joseph Budrow.

Site plan of seven housing sites, with open space and a visual corridor in shades of green

Click here to view detailed site map

 

 

Share

Eagles put on a Show at the River Museum’s “Eagle Watch Boat Tour” on the Connecticut River

Boat tour vessel, the 65 foot "Project Oceanology"

The eagles must have known we were coming! Soaring in the sky high above the decks of Project Oceanology’s 65 foot research vessel, was a solitary bald eagle, circling slowly, already in view. So began, on a recent Friday afternoon, another Connecticut River Museum “Eagle Watch Boat Tour,” pulling away from the museum’s Essex docks on the Connecticut River.

Soon after departure the passengers on board began to spot even more eagles. Some were in pairs and others were single eagles drifting lazily in the sky above. Later in the tour, there would be a final triumphal sighting on Nott Island of a female bald eagle, peeking out of her nest, patiently waiting for her eggs to hatch into baby eaglets.

This afternoon was made for eagle watching, with an unclouded sky, and unseasonably warm temperatures. However, once the vessel got underway, and out into the middle of the river, it was pretty chilly, notwithstanding the warmth on the land.

Passage ways are safe for passengers

39 paying passengers were on board for the tour, designed to spend an hour and a half in search of bald eagles. Even at a ticket cost of forty dollars per person, all those on board truly got their monies worth.

At the microphone the museum’s Naturalist and Educator Bill Yule was at first apologetic that there might be too few eagles to see during the tour. It had been such a warm winter, so perhaps the eagles might not have needed to fly south to find ice free, fishing waters. However, he had no need to apologize. There were plenty of bald eagles to be seen in the sky on this bright, bright day.

Bill Yule, master spotter of the eagles               

Bill Yule is the “Eagle Watch Boat Tour,” Master of Ceremonies. At times he is assisted by Project Oceanology’s Chris Dodge and Allyce Irwin, but Yule handles most of the speaking chores himself.

Boat Tour Moderator Bill Yule at the mike

Early on in the trip, Yule set out an eagle spotting system to help the passengers on board find the eagles in the sky. If an eagle were spotted dead ahead, off the bow of the boat, Yule would call this location “twelve o’clock.” If an eagle was spotted dead astern, it would be “six o’clock.”

Similarly, if an eagle was spotted mid ships at the right side of the vessel, it would be “three o’clock,” and mid ships on the left side of the ship, it would be “nine o’clock.” It was a simple system, but throughout the voyage, it helped guide the on-board eagle watchers to find their visual prey.

Although a few of the passengers needed only the naked eye to enjoy the sight of the eagles, most of the passengers made use of long range cameras, or powerful binoculars, to see the birds. Binoculars, incidentally, were provided at no extra charge to passengers.

DDT and the survival of the eagles

At about midpoint of the boat tour, Yule became very serious. He said that not too many years ago, “the eagles were almost gone from the river.” The reason was that that back in the 1950’s and 1960’s, DDT was widely used as a pesticide, and this pesticide in turn made its way into the waters of the Connecticut River.

The DDT was then ingested by the fish in the river, the very fish that was the staple of the eagle’s diet. DDT’s effect on the eagles turned out to be severe. It made the shells of the eggs of the female eagles too brittle to sheath properly embryonic baby eaglets. Unable to reproduce live birds, the eagle population declined rapidly, even to the point where eagles were put on the nation’s endangered species list.

However, in 1972 DDT was banned, and as a result no longer was DDT in the diet of the fish that the eagles consumed in the river. Able to reproduce again, the eagle population increased along the river; the shells of the mothers now strong enough to hold baby eaglets until their normal birth.

Ultimately, it reached the point where Bill Yule could say the other day, “The eagles have now come back to the river in abundance.”

“It is truly an environmental success story,” he said with a tone of triumph in his voice.

Also a bit of sightseeing on the boat tour

Yule occasionally diverted his attention from eagle spotting to becoming a Connecticut River tour guide.  “We are now passing Selden Island,” he said at one point. “It is the largest island in the State of Connecticut. There are four campsites on the island, and there is an old forge there as well.” He also told the stories of Joshua Rock, the Mount St. John School for Boys and the Gillette Castle.

While the eagle spotting by the passengers was still in full force, Yule mentioned a few eagle statistics. For one, they can fly as high as 12,000 feet in the sky. To reach these heights they take advantage of rising, warm air currents from the land. Also, according to Yule, eagles can fly at up to 50 miles an hour.

Continuing, Yule said that it is only after it reaches the age of four that an eagle’s tail turns white. Also, eagles are not particularly friendly to other birds, and they have been known to take fish out of the mouths of sea gulls.

In addition, eagles mate for life, although if one of the pair dies they quickly find a replacement. Also, a mother eagle sits on her eggs for 35 days before the eggs hatch, and while she is nesting, her mate brings fish for her to eat.

After they are born, the eagle mother will feed her young for several months, and ten weeks after birth the young eagles will learn to fly.  However, eagles are not genetically born to know how to fish, Yule said. It is a skill that they must learn on their own during their first year of life.

Since many young eagles cannot learn to fend for themselves, as many as 50 percent die in their first year of their lives, according to Yule.

The egg-laying season for eagles in the Essex area, this year is from February 2 to 23, Yule said. By June all of the eagles will be gone from our part of the river, having left for cooler waters up north.

                    Eagle watchers were well pleased with the tour

Among the passengers on this “Eagle Watch Boat Tour,” not a single one said they were disappointed with the tour.

Lee Bradley of Newington said, “I thoroughly enjoyed it,” and “the narration was very, very good.” For her part Sandy Clark of Manchester found the trip, “very interesting,” and “it was very good at showing us everything.” Lorraine Trinks of East Hartford simply called the boat tour, “fabulous.”

Close up of a Bald Eagle watcher

The Eagle Watch Boat Tours, sail only on Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays, and they began the 2012 season on February 3. The Friday boat tours will continue sailing until March 9, and the Saturday and Sunday boat tours, will continue sailing until March 10 and 11, respectively.

As for departure times, the Friday boat tours cast off from the museum’s docks at 1:00 p.m., and the Saturday and Sunday boat tours depart on both days at 9:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m.

We shall give Bill Yule the final word on the Eagle Watch Boat Tour. As he puts it, “It is better than any other method to get up close and personal with our national symbol, the Bald Eagle.”

Bill Yule enjoying the ride home

 

Share

High Tech, Medical Company to Move from Chester to Deep River; and Deep River is Delighted

Future Deep River Headquarters of PCI Medical

Deep River First Selectman Dick Smith is a happy man. He has convinced a high tech firm, which manufactures disinfectant medical machines, to move from Chester to Deep River. The precise address of the new plant is, 6 Winter Avenue, which is off the north end of Deep River’s Main Street.

Extensive renovations of the former factory building of 36,000 square feet are now 80 percent complete, according PCI Medical, the new company that is coming to town. When finished and operational, an estimated 50 new jobs will have moved into Deep River. Over thirty of them will be employees of PCI Medical, and the rest will be those of a tenant, according to PCI.

Deep River’s Smith said that he was “very excited about PCI’s move back to Deep River.” “Industrial and commercial development is very important to us,” he said, noting that they add new tax revenues to the town. Also, Smith said that the building that PCI is now remodeling was “in tough shape.” It once housed a metal stamping company, and has been vacant for a number of years.

PCI Medical, a national leader in disinfection systems

“Everything we do is related to disinfection,” says Philip Coles, President of PCI Medical, speaking from PCI’s present headquarters in the industrial area of Chester. Coles runs the company with his wife, Cliodhna Coles, who holds the title of Vice President, and who shares an office with her husband.

Philip and Cliodhna Coles, President and VP of PCI Medical

The essence of PCI’s business is manufacturing machines that disinfect heat sensitive, medical devices used by hospitals, health care facilities and medical laboratories throughout the country. Over 6,000 of these health care facilities are currently customers of PCI Medical.

Many of the disinfectant processes that are addressed by PCI machines are mandated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Joint Commission for Hospital Accreditation.

Coles says that because its disinfectant machines protect health care professionals, the company even receives “thank you” letters from workers in the health care industry.

The PCI disinfectant process

These diagnostic devices in the health care industry that PCI machines disinfect are those that are inserted into to various parts of the human body to determine the health of an individual medical patient. These devices include endoscopes and ultrasound probes.

Philip Coles by a PCI Disinfection Soak System machine

After these medical devices have been used, they are disinfected and “the vapor from the disinfectant can be very dangerous,” says PCI President Coles. To address these dangers PCI manufactures no less than twenty different disinfection soak stations that remove the toxic vapors.

These PCI disinfectant devices fall into two categories. The first are used for endoscopes, and the second are for ultrasound probes.

The endoscope process, according to Coles, “provides an actual medical peek inside a person’s body.”  The ultrasound probe on the other hand generates an ultrasound picture of the probe within the human body to a “live” visual display machine.

PCI’s business consists of manufacturing Disinfection Soak Stations that disinfect the devices that are used in both endoscope and ultrasound medical examinations.

“We provide machines to disinfect these instruments, which also protect the person doing the disinfecting,” Coles points out. The Soak Station machines of PCI are equipped with specially activated carbon filters, which by chemical adsorption protect the user while the medical instruments are disinfected.

Coles says that the machines manufactured by PCI Medical used in the disinfecting process are designed (1) to protect the health care professional using the device, (2) to protect the delicate medical instruments that are being disinfected, and (3) to minimize the use of the liquid disinfectant involved in the process. In fact, PCI’s processes use 75% less disinfectant than other systems, according to Coles.

Furthermore, PCI’s disinfection processes are “ductless,” which means that in the disinfecting process, it is not necessary for a PCI customer to construct ducts to the outside air, according to Coles.

In addition, Coles says that PCI Disinfection Soak Stations prevent splashes and spills.

The PCI Medical success story    

According to Deep River First Selectman Dick Smith, PCI Medical’s first manufacturing site was a 2,000 square feet space in Deep River’s industrial park.  It was in what the town calls an “incubator space.” At the very first the company had only three employees.

Deep River First Selectman Dick Smith, a happy man

However, PCI Medical grew rapidly, and eventually after renting progressively larger sites in town, the company was up to renting a 14,000 square feet space at 12 Bridge Street in Deep River.

But then in 2010 the company had growing pains again. However, this time the amount of rental space that was needed was simply not available in Deep River, so the company moved to a rental property in Chester’s industrial park.

Now, when the extensive reconstruction of its new property on Winter Avenue is complete, PCI will be coming back to Deep River. No one could more pleased by this than Deep River First Selectman, Dick Smith.         

Share

“Fine Line Tattoo Parlour” Adds a Certain Class and Character to the Town of Deep River

Deep River tattoo parlor on Main Street

Mark Roberts of Marlborough is the owner of the busy tattoo shop located at 160-B on Main Street in Deep River. His many tattoos on his own hands and arms make it obvious that Roberts is sold on tattooing; even though when he points to his own tattoos, he does so, a bit self consciously.

Owner Mark Roberts in his "parlour"

Tattooing these days is no longer an activity catering only to sailors on leave and the working class. Now having a tattoo is almost preppy. Also, many women, young and old, these days adorn various parts of their bodies with tattoos.

On a recent Sunday afternoon at the “Fine Line Tattoo Parlour,” three tattooing artists were busy at work. Roberts, himself, was tattooing an intricate design of waves of water along the sides of a young woman’s feet.

Roberts gives woman client a retouch

 

In a second chair in the shop, tattoo artist Jay Kelly of East Windsor was also busy. Kelly, who has spent 17 years in the trade, will soon be working full time in Roberts’ new tattoo parlor in West Hartford.

In the third tattooing chair in the shop, tattoo artist Melissa Stolzmman was updating and enhancing an existing tattoo on the chest of former Marine Corps Sergeant Jeff Beno of Westbrook. Stolzman has 15 years of experience in the tattoo trade.

Marine Corps veteran gets a new design

Talkative and friendly, the shirtless Beno served in Iraq with the Marines, and Stolzman is adding an American flag backdrop to one of Beno’s existing tattoos. Another of Beno’s tattoos paid tribute to his former wife, and Beno says he is going to have it removed.

The kinds of tattoos which are popular these days  

“These days everyone wants a custom designed tattoo,” says shop owner Roberts. “It used to be that people wanted eagles, hearts, daggers, and other traditional designs,” such as the American flag. “Now everyone wants something different,” he says, although tattoos of Jesus remain popular.

There are even “photo reality” tattoos these days, which are tattoos of a portrait of an actual person. As for the clientele of a tattoo shop, Roberts says, “We do lawyers, judges, policemen, and we did a tattoo for a dentist the other day of a smiling tooth.”

One tattoo that Roberts cautions against is having a tattoo with the name of a current girlfriend or boyfriend. “It might change,” he says. “We tattoo names, only if the name involved is a blood relative,” he says.

As for tattooing young people under the age of 18, Roberts says that “parental consent is always requested.” Though he adds, “I am not the morality police,” as to whether people should get a tattoo, and, “I don’t get paid to say no.”

As for the cost of tattooing at the Fine Line Tattoo Parlour, a small tattoo, or a touch up of an existing tattoo, can cost as little as $60. More complicated designs cost as much as $100 to $150 dollars, and even more.

It is a firm policy at the “Fine Line” shop that the tattoo artist will first tell the customer exactly how much his or her tattoo is going to cost, before the work begins.

As for who is getting tattoos these days, according to Roberts and Kelly, roughly 25% of their customers are women, and the remaining 75% are men. Also, three quarters of the people getting tattoos are retouching their original tattoos, or adding new ones.

There are also times when tattoos can serve a very worthy purpose. After a woman has had a mastectomy, drawing a nipple appearing tattoo on her breast can be very important. “These tattooed nipples can be lifesaving,” Roberts says.

The micro-dermal, tattooing process

Roberts describes a tattoo as a permanent cosmetic, or a “design sketched into the skin.” More technically he says that a tattoo is, “a micro-dermal pigmentation that is injected into the skin.”

In applying a tattoo, first, the spot on the body where the tattoo is going to be placed is washed thoroughly with soap and water. Next, an outline of the desired design of the tattoo is sketched by the tattoo artist on to the customer’s skin.

After this pen outline is finished and has dried, a sterilized tattooing needle is injected into the skin with “single use” ink, and the actual tattoo is put into place in the skin. It takes roughly a week for a new tattoo to heal. During the healing process it is important to keep the tattoo clean. According to Roberts, there are rarely any infections caused by tattooing.

Removing at tattoo is difficult

A major characteristic of a tattoo, which adds to its sense of daring, is that tattoos are designed to be in the skin forever. They are extremely difficult to remove. Touch ups consisting of more tattooing can be done again and again, but removal of a tattoo is very different story.

Two kinds of techniques are used to remove tattoos. (1) An existing tattoo can be covered over with another tattoo of a darker color, or (2) a tattoo can be removed by a plastic surgeon using a laser treatment. However, Roberts belittles this treatment, saying, “You can still see it,” or at least the outline as to where the tattoo once was.

To become a fully competent tattoo artist can be a long process. Roberts said that he spend five years as an apprentice in the trade, and his colleagues in the shop served many years of apprenticeship as well.

As for the ambiance of a modern tattoo parlor, It reminds one of a friendly bar or an old fashion barber shop with everyone chatting away. Also, Roberts emphasizes getting to know his customers, “and establishing a relationship of trust.” As for how the tattoo artist feels, Roberts says, “Giving a tattoo to a person is a performance for the tattoo artist,” he says.

Artists at work inside the tattoo parlor

The tattoo shop in Deep River, which was founded in 1980, is the oldest tattoo parlor in the state. As for its present Deep River location, Roberts says, “We will always be here.”

Finally, although “not a piercing shop,” Fine Line Tattoo Parlour does some skin piecing. The most common is piercing the navel and attaching a tiny barbell.

Share

Chaos Reigns, and the Ladies Love it, at Deep River Store on Main Street

The grand view of Chaos

Joann Hourigan refers to her store, Chaos, as “my therapy,” when she is talking about her truly unique enterprise at 114 Main Street in Deep River. Then, when asked why she named her store “Chaos,” she says, “Because that’s my life.”

In addition to owning Chaos, in real life so to speak, Hourigan is also Executive Director of the Deep River Housing Authority, where she has worked for 19 years. The Authority operates Kirtland Commons, which is a home for 31 elderly and disabled residents. “I love my residents and their families,” she says.  One of the residents is 102 years old.

Chaos owner Joanne Hourigan in mirror

“It’s social work,” is what she calls her work at the Commons, and it   gives her a lot of satisfaction to help people in need. At Chaos on the other hand it’s “another story.” “There, I have a chance to create, and that is what I really enjoy.”

Because of her schedule at the Commons, Hourigan frequently leaves running Chaos to Caroline Lemley, a 19 year old U-Conn sophomore. Hourigan calls Lemley, “My main girl.  She runs the place. People love her, and she is awesome at picking things out for customers.”

Chaos staffer Caroline Lemley

Regardless of who is in charge at a particular time, don’t think for a minute that the operation of Chaos is in any way “chaotic.” In fact, it is a tightly run and very successful enterprise, one that by offering an apparent jumble of goods, arouses a customer’s curiosity to find just the right thing; and then once found the customer buys it, even though they didn’t know they wanted it in the first place.

The floor space at Chaos is 300 square feet, allowing only a fifteen by twenty foot sales area. If the clutter of items was spread out in a normal manner, the floor space would have to be twice the size.

Above all, Hourigan wants Chaos to be “a fun place to come into.” “There are treasurers everywhere,” she says, “even stuff in birdcages.” “I love it that it is so packed in here,” she continues, “That is part of its charm.”

Looking about carefully cluttered Chaos, one sees practically every kind of feminine accessory known to man. “We are selling scarves, handbags and jewelry, and a lot of custom jewelry,” Hourigan says.

Crowded table top at Chaos

Also, partially open draws at Chaos bulge with cascades of objects, and every open space on tables are piled high with a profusion of necklaces, clasps, pins, bracelets and many other ornaments that intrigue and enhance the feminine taste.

Turnover is very quickly,” says Hourigan. Quick turnover means that even if a customer was in the store just a few days before, when she returns to the store a few days later, she can find new things to buy on her return visit.

The recent Christmas holiday was a boom at Chaos. “Christmas was fabulous,” says Hourigan. Racks of women’s clothing were sold, “and we even ran out of boots,” she says.

Chaos’ reasonable prices also encourage a quick turnover of goods for sale. At Chaos earrings cost $18, necklaces $20, and dresses and tops $28. Some of the necklaces sold at Chaos can be mistaken for heirlooms, according to at least one regular shopper at the store.

Bottle caps from Chaos

Also, when it’s warm enough, Chaos offers a running sequence of appealing sidewalk sales. One item of particular popularity is the “buck bowl.” Everything in the bowl costs a buck, i.e. a dollar, no matter what its original price.

When asked, how she selects the items that go into the “buck bowl,” Hourigan says, “I throw in things that I am tired of, or have only one left.” Fishing in the “buck bowl” is a very popular pastime for shopping anglers.

Store hours at Chaos are: Wednesday thru Saturday, 10:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. There are some stores in our area, when at times you cannot find what you are looking for. However, most of the time at Chaos, you’ll find it.

Share

Connecticut River Museum has Spent $500,000 to Restore Historic Landmark After Fire

Destroyed East face, roof and decking of CT River Museum after August 2010 fire

The Connecticut River Museum, located at 67 Main Street in downtown Essex, had two choices in the wake of the devastating fire that took place on August 11, 2010, a fire which caused enormous damage to the Museum’s building, as well as to its decking.

One approach would have been to repair the damage, essentially, to the extent that the insurance money would cover the costs, and then hope for the best that other repairs, some very necessary, could be deferred until another day.

The second approach would address every single item that needed to be repaired, and in the process restore the museum not only to the condition of what it was before the fire, but perhaps even improve it from what it was. This full restoration plus choice, obviously, would cost a lot more money than the first, bare bones scenario.

The Board of Trustees of the Connecticut River Museum never blinked. They whole heartedly adopted the second alternative of fully repairing and restoring the Museum. In doing so, the Board chose to address every single item that required repair and the full restoration of the Museum.

Executive Director Jerry Roberts pridefully shows off restored Connectiuc River Museum

Furthermore, in adopting the full restoration plan the Board implicitly accepted the responsibility to raise the necessary money.

Board of Directors Chairman Maureen Wiltsie-O’Grady in a recent interview said, “The Museum had to be restored, because of the love that the community has for the Museum.” She added, “It is just a jewel. The fire made people think what Essex would be like without the Museum.”

Board Chairman Maureen Wilsie-O'Grady points to announcements at new Museum portal

These observations by the Chairman underscored the fact that the increased public attention and sympathy that was generated by the fire could be converted into a unique fundraising opportunity to pay for the level of restoration needed to ensure that the Museum would withstand the next 100 years.

With the stars thus aligned, the Museum Board, led by former Chairman Timothy Boyd, and the staff, led by the energetic Executive Director Jerry Roberts, went ahead and successfully raised the funds needed to repair the fire damage, and enhance generally the Museum’s building and grounds.

The fundraising steps included the establishment of the CMT Fire Fund for donations from Museum trustees, members and the public at large, as well as a successful effort to attract new government grants for the Museum’s restoration. Both these steps were in addition to achieving the Museum’s already established fundraising goals for the Annual Fund Appeal, Fall Ball, RIVERFARE and Privateers’ Bash.

These aggressive, and breathtakingly successful, fundraising steps has allowed the Museum, to date, to expend over a half million dollars, $565,500 to be exact, to repair and restore the Museum to a point where it is in even better condition than it was before the fire.

For example, with the funds raised the entire east face of the Museum building, which was destroyed by the fire, has been fully repaired and restored.

Similarly, large portions of the roof and the decking, which were destroyed by the fire, have been restored, as has the third floor gallery, which suffered water damage, and the Museum building, which experienced smoke damage.

Also included in this roster of fully paid for items was the installation of 29 new, energy efficient, museum-quality windows, as well as the installation of 70 new pilings under the decking of the Museum.

A further breakdown of the fully paid for repairs and restoration in the wake of the fire are as follows:

Building restoration and repair

This $300,000 item paid for by insurance monies and private donations, included a smoke and water clean-up; roof and siding repairs; window replacement of four fire destroyed windows and the upgrade of 25 other gallery windows; replacement of the building sign; repair of indoor mural; removal of carpets and restoration of the original wood flooring on the second and third floors.

Decking replacement and repair

This $185,000 item, which was funded from grants, donations and insurance, as well as funds from the Museum’s own historic building maintenance fund, provided money to replace the substructure pilings and decking surrounding the Museum building.

Grant funds for this project included $73,955 from the Connecticut Commission on Cultural and Tourism’s Historic Preservation Office.

Perimeter and Security/Grounds

In this category, $80,000 of private donations funded a new Museum perimeter security project, coupled with a grounds’ renovation plan. This initiative included new lights, a new portal at the entrance of the property, new walkways and the refurbishment of plantings. This project is now in its final stage of completion.

As for the new portal, according to Roberts, it will serve two purposes: 1) to establish a demarcation line between town property and Museum property, so that Museum property can be gated after hours, or whenever necessary, and 2) to provide information about Museum exhibits, programs and events.

The items regarding the perimeter and the security of the Museum property, obviously, go beyond simply repairing the Museum’s fire damages. Also, one of the items in this initiative has been objected to by a few Essex residents.

Specifically, the new portal structure, a few residents charge, takes away from the sense of openness of the Museum’s grounds that existed previously. Museum officials acknowledge that there have been a few objections to the portal structure; however, they assert that the objections are far from general, and that the upsides of the portal far outweigh the downsides, particularly from the standpoint of the Museum’s security.

Also, this very minor ruffle should in no way take away from the monumental achievement of the Museum’s Board and staff, who on their watch brilliantly restored the Connecticut River Museum to a condition that is even better than it was before the fire. In so doing they have preserved this historic asset for the edification and enjoyment of generations to come.

Share

“Trendy” or Not, a Successful Men’s Store is Adding Class to Downtown Deep River

Front windows of Anchor & Compass, "A Store for Guys"

“I really don’t like to be classified as trendy,” says owner Sage Novak,  referring to her very successful men’s store, Anchor & Compass, located at 163 Main Street in heart of Deep River. “I feel I am anything but,” she says, terming the clothing theme in her store as “conservative and traditional New England.”

Also, she says, “A large portion of my guy customers are working class folk that come in for the Carhartt brand, T-shirts,” and “I work hard to convey an ‘every man’s’ image.”

To burnish this image she even holds “beer tastings” at the store. Also, the store’s slogan is, “A Store for Guys.”

Inside, it is easy to navigate Anchor & Compass. Each name-brand line of clothing has its own discreet sales area. Among the most popular, especially for the over 50-years-old set, is the “Old Guys Rule” line.

"Old Guys Rule" T-shirts are a best seller

These T-shirts carry sayings on their fronts that poke fun about getting old, and remembering the glory days of youth. Some customers have whole collections of the shirts, saying such things as, “The older I Get, The Better I Was.” “Old Guys Rule” shirts are $24 for a T-shirt, and $28 for long sleeves.

Another popular brand, which features shirts displaying fishing humor, comes from the “Fish On!” company, located in Chester, Connecticut. These shirts cost $24 for T-shirts and $29 for long sleeves.

Yet another popular men’s clothing line, carried by Anchor & Compass, is the Old Harbor Outfitters from Block Island, New York. Old Harbor makes outdoor apparel, as well as fishing gear. One specialty is a wide selection of fishing knifes. The knives sell for $10 to $24 a piece, and Novak says, “We sell tons of them. They make great gifts.”

“We also sell tons of flannels every Christmas season,” she says, “and flannels never go out of style.” Over the past Christmas season, Novak reports, the store sold close to 200 flannel shirts. Their price range is from $49 to $59.

Selling the “layered look” for Guys

Speaking of flannels the savvy shopkeeper suggests to her customers that they might like the “layered look.” This look consists of first putting on an ordinary shirt, then covering it with a flannel, and then over them both a shirt jacket.  There are other layered look combinations as well. Shirt jackets go for $79 at “A Store for Guys.”

Store owner Novak shows off some outer wear

At one point while touring the store, a fashionably dressed woman came in and asked, if she could make a few returns. It turned out that the woman did not have just a few returns, but seven of them. All of the items were still in their original boxes, and some had not even been unwrapped.

It turned out that the woman’s husband, before the big holiday, had explicitly told his wife, “Do not buy me any clothes for Christmas.” However, the wife, thinking she knew best, blithely ignored this instruction, and bought lots of them. Now she was forced to return them.

While this was going on, the woman tried to make conversation. “Maybe I should exchange my husband rather than the shirts,” she said, attempting humor.

With no sign of displeasure whatsoever, store owner Novak removed the seven items from their boxes, and went ahead and restored their full cost to the woman’s credit card.

After the woman left, Novak pointed out that many stores offer only “store credit” for returns. However, at Anchor & Compass the policy is to give a full refund, as long as the purchaser has a receipt.

“Most people exchange stuff,” Novak says, but getting full credit for an unwanted purchase is still an option at the store.

Among her favorite items in the store, Novak calls attention to the Leathermen Limited line. The company is based in Essex, Connecticut, and offers a variety of canvas belts, flip-flops and key chains. Featured in the store as well are rows of men’s pants, a wide variety of sweaters and lots of T-shirts.

Adding a good citizenship quality to the store, Anchor & Compass offers a 10% discount on all merchandize purchased by volunteer firefighters and emergency rescue volunteers, whether they come from Deep River or beyond.

All for men, a colorful collection of T-shirts, caps and mugs

Not only are sales on the increase generally at the store, Novak is particularly pleased that more and more men are purchasing clothing.  The present gender breakdown at the store is that about 60 percent of the buyers are women, buying clothes for men; and 40 percent are men, buying clothes for themselves or for their best buddies.

If this ratio could even out to 50-50, Novak would be a very happy. As an inducement to get more men into the store, she has built a large, man sized fitting room. Also, she may give men shoppers just a little extra attention in making their purchases. After all it is, “A Store for Guys.”

The overall growth in sales at Anchor & Compass is truly impressive. Sales in the month of January, to date, are running 56 percent higher than they were over the same period last year.

Big Selling Seasons, Christmas and Father’s Day

As a general rule the store has two big selling seasons each year. One is during the run up to Christmas, and the other are the shopping days before Father’s Day. Since Anchor & Compass focuses on men’s clothing, it has an especially big boost in sales before Father’s Day. It is so big that Novak calls Father’s Day “a second Christmas.”

As for staff at the store, Novak pretty much runs the place on her own, although she has two part time helpers, both from Deep River.

Novak feels anchored in Deep River, and she has, if you will, found her compass in the town. In starting up her venture a year and a half ago, she received encouragement from Deep River First Selectman Dick Smith, and both Smith and his son are customers. Also, in remodeling the store Novak is proud that she used exclusively local labor.

Owner Sage Novak in front of her Deep River store

Among the things that she likes about Deep River is that her kids can walk to school, and, “I love the quality of life in the town.” Beyond that, “I want people to enjoy the store. I love just love it, when people run into other people that they know, while they are shopping here.”

Novak is a native of Deep River, and sometimes refers to herself as “a river rat.” Not only did she grow up in town, her family used to own the Deep River Marina.

Not that Sage Novak has always had happy times in her life. In June of 2008 her husband, who was a college sweetheart, died in a car accident, leaving her with two daughters, aged four and one. “I took off a year to heal,” she says. “Still, I don’t believe in wallowing. You have to go on and enjoy life in the time that you have.”

Finally, the name of her store, Anchor & Compass, has a special meaning for Sage Novak as a person.  As you get to know her, she just might share it with you.

 

Share

Essex Wetlands Commission Takes “Site Walk” of Potential Foxboro Point Development

Commission members gather in front of the Croft house

On an extremely cold, sunny Saturday, members of Essex’s Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission took a “site walk” of 11 presently vacant acres on Foxboro Point. The purpose of the wintry visit was to give members of the Commission a first-hand look at property on which a private developer has filed an application to build seven new houses.

The 11 acres subject to this development are located on arguably one of the most scenic points in all of Essex, namely Foxboro Point. The site offers a sweeping view of North Cove and, in the distance, the Connecticut River.

Commission members set off on the "site walk" of the proposed development.

The application to develop the property was filed on Jan. 3 of this year by Frank J. Sciame, the Wall Street businessman, who bought and updated the Katharine Hepburn home in Old Saybrook a few years ago. He also owns a private home next to the Hepburn estate.

The sellers of the targeted property are members of the Croft family and their associates, who have owned the property for many years. The Croft house at the entrance to Foxboro Point is a familiar town landmark, and will not be demolished, according the developer’s present plan. Under the proposed plan, the famous windmill will also stay in place.

The Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission has scheduled a public hearing on the proposed development on Feb. 14, which will be held at Town Hall. According to the Commission’s web sites it has the following powers that could be relevant to the proposed new development. The Commission:

          “Hears, consider[s] and decide[s] upon applications for regulated activities involving inland wetlands and water courses and/or the regulated upland area to a wetland. Determine[s] whether proposed activities are exempt from, or otherwise not subject to, the regulations. In Essex, the commission reviews the activities that are within 60’ [feet] of a designated wetland and within 100’ [feet] of a water body or water course.”

The Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission Chairman's gloved hand seeks to prevent his picture being taken.

ValleyNewsNow contributor Jerome Wilson joined the site walk since it was an official activity of the Inland Wetlands  &  Watercourses  Commission, which is a governmental body.

His presence did not seem entirely welcome, although, as a general rule, such activities would as a matter of course be open to the public and press, unless some extraordinary circumstances are demonstrated.

 

Share

Congressman Lauds Chester Aerospace Firm for Receiving Federal Award for Export Sales

AeroCision CEO Andrew Gibson accepting award from Congressman Courtney and trade rep. Evans

Congressman Joe Courtney visited the headquarters of the Chester based aerospace manufacturer, AeroCision, recently to attend a ceremony at which AeroCision received the United States, “Export Achievement Award.” The award was presented to the company for its success in achieving a total of $1 million in exports in the year 2011.

The award was personally presented to the firm by Anne S. Evans, Director of the Connecticut District Office of the U.S. Commercial Service of the U.S. Department of Commerce and eastern Connecticut Congressman Joe Courtney. It was accepted by Andrew J. Gibson, CEO of AeroCision.

“Here is a company that is absolutely competing and winning in export markets,” said Director Evans in presenting the award.

A statement issued by Congressman Courtney office provided background about the award:

“Last year Rep. Courtney and Anne Evans of the U.S. Department of Congress joined AeroCision representatives on a trade mission to the United Kingdom. During the trip, the company was able to solidify the international relationships and expand markets, boosting their overall exports from $300,000 in 2010 to $1 million in 2011.”

In the statement AeroCision CEO Andrew Gibson was quoted as saying, “When we were in the UK with Congressman Courtney, we were at a crucial point with Rolls Royce.”

Gibson continued, “The fact that I was in the UK with a member of the Armed Services Committee seeking global opportunities within the UK demonstrated our sincere commitment as a global supplier. The timing was perfect. The supply chain people at Rolls were impressed. In sum, the trip and our association with Department of Commerce added prestige and credibility at a critical time.”

AeroCision workers attended the ceremony enjoyed the lunch

The award ceremony was followed by a sandwich luncheon with many of the 60 AeroCision employees that work at the aerospace plant in Chester.

Congressman Courtney chows down with AeroCision workers

An AeroCision spokesman said that in connection with the trade mission to the UK, the company paid for all of the travel expenses of its employees in connection with the trip.

Share

Sunday Breakfast at Ivoryton’s Aggies. You can’t get more down home than this!

Outdoor sign of Aggies of Ivoryton

Aggies restaurant on Main Street in Ivoryton is certainly the place to be for Sunday breakfast. That is, if you want a breakfast that is big enough “to sink a battleship,” and a camaraderie among the regulars that is warm enough to make you feel right at home, even on your first visit.

Why do people like Robin and Jim Keating of Westbrook, make the trek almost every Sunday from Westbrook to go to Aggies for breakfast? As Robin puts it, “Because the food is good. The service is good, and the people are friendly. She adds, “Also, the place is clean, and it feels like home.”

"Breakfast at Aggies," the best

Their favorite, Sunday after Sunday, is two orders of eggs and sausage, and together they split a blueberry pancake.

Marty Radomski of Ivoryton also has a take on Aggies. He says, “The food is good and healthy.” He also likes that they don’t chase you out, if you want to linger.” “There are a lot of nice people here,” he adds.

At the counter of the restaurant one of the diners, who identified himself as “Glenn G,” orders a substantial breakfast consisting of bacon, sausage, two eggs, home fries, toast and coffee. When it arrives, he says, “It’s worth waiting for.”

Then way in back of the restaurant is the table of regulars, who are-pleased enough with Aggies to raise their coffee mugs to toast her.

Regulars raising their mugs toasting Aggie

Working in the restaurant on a recent Sunday morning, there was of course Aggie, whose last name is Waterman. Aggie personally does most of the cooking herself. She in turn is assisted by her husband, Bill Waterman, and a wait staff of two daughters, Mary Bowers and Rachelle Waterman, and of two granddaughters, Alexa Clark and Madison Estelle.

Aggie and her chief assistant, husband Bill

Although Sunday breakfast is Aggies’ number one event, the restaurant is also open Monday thru Friday from 6:00 a.m. to two p.m., and Saturday from 6:00 a.m. to noon. Sunday it is opened 7:00 a.m. to noon (breakfast only).

As for the breakfast menu there are eggs any style with bacon, ham, and sausage, as well as hash and eggs and omelets. There is also a choice of one, two or three pancakes, as well as French toast, cereal, waffles and Kielbasa and eggs.

A "modest" Sunday breakfast

Aggies serves a lunch every day but Sunday. On the lunch menu are hamburgers, cheese burgers, and what is listed as a “Large Hot Dog,” as well as grilled cheese. Luncheon appetizers include a special Appetizer Plate, consisting of Mozilla sticks, peppers, chicken fingers and onion rings.

Also, for lunch Aggies serves homemade shrimp chowder and other luncheon specials, and there are traditional soft drinks, coffee and tea. Coffee refills are free.

When asked what she does after the big, big Sunday brunch, Aggie said, “I go home and put my feet up.”

Share