February 22, 2012

Letters: Proposed Bill Would Impact Shoreline Property Rights

To The Editor:

Shoreline residents need to be informed about a new Legislative bill which, if passed, could heavily impact their property rights. A public hearing will be held at the State Capitol on Wednesday Feb 22 at 11:00 a.m.

For information go to:
http://ctsenaterepublicans.com/2012/02/heres-how-shoreline-residents-can-weigh-in-on-a-proposal–that-impacts-their-property-rights–senator-fasano-talks-to-am-960-welis-vinnie-penn-audio/

 

Sincerely,

Neil Nichols,
Essex, CT

 

Letters – More Transparent Process Concerning “Agenda 21” Needed

To the Editor:

The rumblings around Essex about ICLEI and Agenda 21 (around since about 1992) are reaching a crescendo. It seems that bubbling-up from the collective unconscious is the sense that there is a threat to our individual rights and freedoms. I admit that, until recently, I didn’t have a clue as to what the “Agenda” was about. I began my research, appropriately, on a website entitled Agenda 21 for Dummies. From there, I have tried to ferret out the facts. There are those who unabashedly and passionately promote the Agenda and others that are dead set against the Agenda -seeing it as the imposition of Socialism. I agree with the latter. If our community chooses to do the research, most will realize that Agenda 21 is not just a toothless Socialist Agenda, but a radical, extremist environmentalist agenda that poses a real threat to our liberties. The plan of action, in simple terms, is to force people into dense living arrangements through land use regulations and the curtailing of freedoms. The ultimate goal is the abolition of private property. And, under the guise of social justice and a healthy planet, proponents use fraudulent science and an idealized portrayal of the repeatedly failed Socialist philosophy to manipulate our youth.

Consider the latest piece of propaganda to cross my desk. At the 5 January school board meeting, it was announced that the Region 4 cafeteria will adopt “Meatless Mondays.” Wow, this is a great idea to help kid’s focus on their health while tasting some delicious vegetarian recipes.  But not so fast, the indoctrination follows: Meatless Mondays “will reduce our carbon footprint and lead the world in the race to reduce climate change.” These sentiments are being spoon fed to our youth. They are based on sketchy science that is at present being debunked by many of the very same scientists that have made bucket- loads of money perpetrating the hoax. The kid’s should be taught the truth. Whether it is called Global Warming, Climate Change or Weather Disruptions, it is still baloney.  Climate change has occurred since recorded history. Melting icecaps were reported by Chinese mariners as far back as the 1400’s?   Perhaps it would be more fruitful to have “Meatless Mondays” as a protest against the real and hideous treatment of animals at factory farms.

Now I will stop preaching about a subject that I am only beginning to digest. And, although the tenets of Agenda 21 are giving me heart-burn, the purpose of this letter is not to expound the extremist views of Agenda 21. There is a plethora of information online and citizens can make up their own minds.  My purpose is to ask why Essex is one of only seven towns and cities in Connecticut and one of only a  thousand , or so, cities and towns in the world that have signed on as members?  Who or what entity promulgated this on the Town of Essex?  Do our tax dollars pay dues to ICLEI? Was becoming a member of ICLEI (International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives) and Agenda 21 a transparent process or a stealth act? And lastly, how do we extricate ourselves?  The citizens of Essex deserve full disclosure.

Sincerely,

Alison Nichols,
Essex, CT 

Letters: Thank You Essex!

To the Editor:

We would like to thank the Community for their generous support of the Stuff-A-Cruiser events at the Colonial Market on November 18th and December 16th.  We broke our previous record at both events collecting a total of over 5500 pounds of food for the Shoreline Soup Kitchens and Pantries.

Our community is lucky to have such giving people.  One gentleman went into the store to buy a gallon of water and came out with a cart of groceries.  A woman who had just won some money on a lottery ticket and filled up two grocery carts of items to donate.  And yet another resident handed us a $500 dollar check to spend on food items.

Our appreciation also goes to the community groups who supported our efforts and provided entertainment:  Essex Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts, the confirmation class of Our Lady of Sorrows Church,  the Deep River Fife and Drum Corp, VRHS Chorus, JWMS Choir and Grace Notes bell ringers.

The Soup Kitchen was extremely grateful for these donations at a very demanding time of year.  We couldn’t have done it without you.

Thank you.

 The Essex Community Fund

 

 

Letters: Essex Blood Drive Thanks

To The Editor:

We are writing to thank the many donors and volunteers who supported the blood drive at Essex Town Hall on December 2.  The goal was to collect 80 pints. Eighty-four pints were successfully donated.  We are fortunate that so many people in the area are personally dedicated to donating.  One person achieved the one-gallon mark; another received an 8 gallon pin. Eileen Patrie donated her 100th pint!  And there was one first-time donor.

Blood is always in short supply.  We are extremely gratified that so many recognize the ongoing need and are able to donate so that blood is available to transfuse those who are ill.

You may be surprised to learn that 19 volunteers were involved in this drive.  This includes friends who prepare the homemade goodies for the hospitality table as well as workers at the event.  In addition, we are very appreciative of the contributions made by local merchants.  Riggio’s Flower Shop donates roses for each of the drives, which we give to first-time donors and those who reach new “gallon” benchmarks.  IGA and the Knights of Columbus provide some of the food used to make sandwiches for the hospitality table.

We will be in touch for the next drive in Essex scheduled for February 3.

Sincerely,

Dick and Linda Levene

Letters: Basketball Center Bad Location

To The Editor:

The last thing we need near an emergency facility and high power lines is a basketball court.  I can not believe that anyone with a clear mind would wish this to be placed there.  I do not object to a court, but not there.  And, what is wrong with using the gym at the elementary school to which we all pay our taxes to support?

When there is a fire emergency, the firemen move very fast to the firehouse and then just as quickly out of the building, the driveway and down the road.  Someone surely will be injured at some point in the future.  Essex does not need another lawsuit?

Let’s find another means to accomplish the goal of the Park & Rec.

Sincerely,

Melanie Phoenix,
Essex.

Letters: Thank You Essex Automobile Club

To The Editor:

Child & Family Agency of Southeastern Connecticut is grateful to the members of the Essex Automobile Club whose fall car show benefits the children served by Child & Family Agency. The weather didn’t cooperate this fall and therefore the Car Show had to be cancelled. The Essex Automobile Club planned to return the registration fees to the participants but many asked that their contributions still be given to Child & Family. The Agency is grateful for this wide community support which allowed us to provide needed services to over 17,100 children and their families last year.

Thank you Essex Automobile Club and participants for your continued support!
With deep appreciation

Judy Lovelace

Director of Resource Development
& Community Relations

Child & Family Agency of SE CT

 

Letters: Moving On

To The Editor:

Another Essex election has come and gone with an outcome that would have and should have been very different.  It is now up to our residents to attend meetings, ask questions and hold these elected officials, who work for us, accountable.

With that stated, let us say that we are both very proud of Bruce MacMillian for running a squeeky clean campaign.  He has more integrity in one finger than most people have in their entire body.

Thanks Bruce and thank you Jerri, his wife and most ardent supporter.

A clear conscience makes a soft bed pillow.

We were happy to support you and Joel Marzi.

Sincerely,

Melanie and Paul Phoenix

Essex, CT

Letters: He said – He Said

To The Editor:

At the most recent budget hearings in the spring, numerous elected officials and town residents advocated using a scalpel rather than an axe when addressing required budget adjustments following a failed budget vote. It appears that Mr. MacMillian is advocating just that. Rather than simply cutting certain line items, he is insisting on justifying their existence and funding them at an appropriate level. Requiring non-profit organizations to justify their contribution to the municipality which provides the funding is sound governance. This level of accountability is a must at all levels of government. Meals on wheels and visiting nurses are just a couple of the line items discussed in various letters and articles and identified as being “in jeopardy”. Arguably these two non-profits provide a service to Essex and will continue to be funded. Many of the other line items may also be justified. Some may not. Mr. MacMillian simply requires that justification.

With respect to the most recent “he-said – he-said” political mailing, this discourse serves two non-productive ends. First, it is a disservice to the voters. Playing on emotions of fear and threatening unjustified cuts by an opponent, although an excellent political move, leaves voters misinformed. Second, this sets a poor tone for the next board of selectmen. These two individuals, more likely than not, will be serving together for the next two years. The level of trust on that board is now shattered due to the misleading out-of-context references.

For those that have attended some of the board and commission meetings discussing critical issues in the past, we have seen some very polarizing discussions, accusations, and behavior. I fear that this polarization is about to continue.

Sincerely,

Phil Beckman

Letters: What’s wrong with questioning non-profit funding?

To The Editor:

It strikes me as odd that Mr. Needleman does not want to question some of the funding provided to non-profits from taxpayer funds.  For example, why does Essex provide $33,000 to Tri Town Youth Services Bureau, Inc., when our neighboring town, one of the Tri Town area, Deep River only provides $5,000?  Essex has 20% more children under age 17, but why such a large difference?  While I am sure Tri Town Youth Services does a great job, this annual difference, in just this one non-profit, has been going on for many years, resulting in a significant outlay of taxpayer funds.  Perhaps there is a good reason, however, one would expect a better answer than that given by Mr. Needleman who describes hundreds of thousands of dollars as a mere pittance.  It is definitely time to start asking tough questions of the people who are distributing taxpayers money!

Sincerely,

John Ackermann
Essex

Letters: We need to put Selectmen in office who have their priorities in order

To The Editor:

Mr. Wilson’s article provided plenty of Norm Needleman responses to questions during a telephone interview but precious little information on what Bruce MacMillian’s stand is on the issues. We know Bruce has denied the three points brought up in the hit piece that went out, but what exactly did he say during the telephone interview and during the debate?

Mr. Wilson, were you at the debate when Bruce said the libraries of Essex and Ivoryton would continue to get funding from the town because they do provide a return to the town? That was unequivocal. Did you hear him say he absolutely supports the fire department and emergency services because, with the police department, they are the most important services the town provides? At no time has funding for the library or essential services ever been a question. Did you hear Bruce talk about the fact we have two working constables when we’re paying for four? I believe that was one of the things he was referring to when talking about a professional police department. What’s professional about having half a force?

It bothers me greatly that Norm, as a current Selectman, has a very cavalier attitude about the tax money the hard working citizens of our town entrust to the Selectmen by using it to fund non-profit organizations that are best supported by individuals. Bruce is correct to want to carefully consider where our money goes. We need someone who is capable of saying “no.” With the likelihood State tax money given back to the town is going to be cut, we need someone who will be a tough protector of our treasury so we can afford to maintain our lovely town even if faced with less money, and not have it siphoned off to groups that do nothing to maintain our infrastructure or benefit our schools. It is not the town’s responsibility to provide money to non-profits.

Tomorrow’s vote is very important. We need to put Selectmen in office who have their priorities in order and who will be careful with the monies entrusted to them and not spend them on unnecessary expenditures. We need Bruce MacMillian and Joel Marzi to rein in the increasing town budget.

Sincerely.

Adrienne Forrest
Essex